Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Student, prof build budget supercomputer (gigaflops on the cheap)
Calvin.Edu ^ | August 30 , 2007 | Allison Graff

Posted on 08/31/2007 9:15:39 AM PDT by N3WBI3

Student, prof build budget supercomputer
August 30 , 2007

Tim Brom stands next to supercomputer MicrowulfWhen Tim Brom 07’ set out to build a budget supercomputer with Calvin computer science professor Joel Adams, he didn’t know the product of his efforts might end up in his checked baggage headed for England.

Brom, now a graduate student at the University of Kentucky continuing his studies in computer science, worked with Adams to build Microwulf, a machine that is among the smallest and least expensive supercomputers on the planet.

“It’s small enough to check on an airplane or fit next to a desk,” said Brom.

This may prove useful next summer when Brom and others from his graduate program travel to England to do work that will require “a significant amount of computing power.” And as the price of commercial supercomputers is often prohibitive for many educational institutions, bringing a “personal” supercomputer like Microwulf could be a cost-effective solution for the group of graduate researchers.

“So far as we can tell, this is the first supercomputer to have this low price/performance ratio—the first to cost less than $100/Gflop,” said Adams.

This is a significant achievement considering that Microwulf is more than twice as fast as Deep Blue, the IBM-created supercomputer that beat world chess champion Gary Kasparov in 1997, and cost only a fraction of the $5 million spent to build Deep Blue.

Microwulf has been measured to process 26.25 gigaflops, or 26.25 billion double-precision floating point instructions, per second. It achieves this performance by relying on four dual-core motherboards connected by an 8-port Gigabyt Ethernet switch. The connected components form a three-tiered system that looks like a triple-decker sandwich.

Design of supercomputer Microwulf

Supercomputers like Microwulf are used to solve problems that take too much number-crunching for an ordinary desktop to handle, either because its processor is too slow, or because it doesn’t have enough memory, said Adams. Truly huge supercomputers (more than 100 times as fast as Microwulf) are used by organizations like the National Weather Service to process meteorological data and by the United States Missile Defense Agency to simulate nuclear tests.

Microwulf is considered a Beowulf cluster, a group of networked computers that run open source software and work in parallel to solve a single problem. Beowulf clusters are so named because their homemade, cost-effective nature liberates researchers from expensive commercial options for super-computing, much like Beowulf of the Old English poem liberated the Danes from the tyrannical rule of Grendel.

Do Brom and Adams see themselves as “liberators” by unveiling of a system like Microwulf?

“We’re taking the liberation a step further,” said Adams. “Instead of a bunch of researchers having to share a single Beowulf cluster supercomputer, now each researcher can have their own.”

Just two years ago, building a personal supercomputer like Microwulf for the price of a high-performance desktop was out of the realm of possibility for Adams and Brom. But when they saw a portable Beowulf cluster called Little Fe at a conference in October 2005, they began to think about building their system.

Learn More

Learn more about Microwulf from a report at Cluster Monkey.

Visit Joel Adam's Web site to find out more about Microwulf's design, performance and pricing.

Discover the world of Beowulf clusters.

Read about Joel Adams' grant to build a new supercomputer for Calvin.

“I was really enjoying my high-performance computing class and wanted to keep working in that area after the class ended. I was also thinking about graduate school at the time and a project like Microwulf looks good on a curriculum vitae,” said Brom.

So by the summer of 2006 when the price of hardware materials needed to build Microwulf had gone down, Adams asked his academic department to provide $2500 for the project. He also asked Brom, then beginning his last year at Calvin, to help him build the supercomputer. In January of 2007, they began to piece together their system and by March, they were running tests to see just what Microwulf could do. In the end, the project came in under budget with Microwulf donning a price-tag of just $2470. With current hardware prices, another system like Microwulf would cost half of what it cost Adams and Brom to build earlier this year.

Though supercomputers are typically evaluated on their price/performance ratio, Adams built Microwulf giving attention to its power/performance ratio as well. In other words, he wanted to pay attention to the system’s energy consumption.

“This is becoming increasingly important, as excess power consumption is inefficient and generates waste heat, which can in turn decrease reliability,” said Adams on his Web site.

Adams and Brom managed to build Microwulf so that it could plug into one standard 120V wall outlet. This feature only enhances the system’s portability, allowing it to be taken to classrooms and other research labs where large power supplies are unavailable.

Adams isn’t going to let Microwulf gather dust in the supercomputing lab in the Science Building. Instead he’s going to take it out on the road, mostly to middle school and high school classrooms to try and get teenagers hooked on computer science.

Microwulf’s inventors aren’t set on keeping their blueprints for the supercomputer a secret. In fact, they’ve just published a detailed description and evaluation of their project on Cluster Monkey so others can build their own portable and affordable supercomputers.

It remains to be seen whether Brom will be able to get his wire-filled personal supercomputer past airport security next summer.

~written by Allison Graff, web communications coordinator



TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: christianeducation; computers; doityourself; linux; michigan; opensource; supercomputer; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: antiRepublicrat
It is a waste of government resources

Ferreting out communist spies is never a waste of resources, nor is putting in security controls for technology that is desired by our enemies.

you go on vile personal attacks...think you're posting this from your mom's basement

LOL at the irony of your attempted BS. If anything's in question it's if you're posting from Russia.

41 posted on 09/01/2007 4:57:45 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
LOL at the irony of your attempted BS.

You only confirm what I said.

42 posted on 09/01/2007 5:02:24 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Wow, your confusion even threw me for a bit. This article is not talking about doing a basic NAC. That is checking the FBI and other government agencies to see if they have anything bad on you. This is about a a full background investigation, including interviews with people you know.
NASA calls on employees to permit investigators to delve into medical, financial and past employment records, and to question friends and acquaintances about everything from their finances to sex lives, according to the suit. The requirements apply to everyone from janitors to visiting professors.
That is normally reserved for positions requiring access to classified information. Now that I think about it, that sounds like a Single Scope Background Investigation, normally reserved for those requiring Top Secret clearance with access to Special Compartmented Information.

And they're wasting resources doing it for the janitors now.

43 posted on 09/01/2007 5:08:29 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Fits the one worlder mindset perfectly doesn’t it:

Security checks of US Government employees = “wasted resources”


44 posted on 09/01/2007 5:17:07 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
sounds like a Single Scope Background Investigation, normally reserved for those requiring Top Secret clearance

Bogus of course, it doesn't have to be a top secret position to do a background check, but whatever excuse you can come up with to justify not checking for potential spies.

45 posted on 09/01/2007 5:29:03 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Unnecessary Security checks of US Government employees = “wasted resources”

There, fixed it. BTW, these are not US Government employees, they are JPL employees working on contracts from NASA.

46 posted on 09/01/2007 8:02:41 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
they are JPL employees working on contracts from NASA

Won't be for long.

47 posted on 09/01/2007 8:29:41 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Bogus of course, it doesn't have to be a top secret position to do a background check

Sorry, dude, but the government has standard levels of invasiveness of their security checks, and they escalate depending on the level of clearance requested. That deep of a background investigation does not happen unless you're getting access to classified material.

I refer you to this OPM document. A NAC is superficial, they just want to know you are who you say you are, your credentials check out, and you haven't done anything bad. Notice that as soon as credit/financials is searched for contractors, as it was for these people, you're now going for a clearance.

So at the very least they are doing the equivalent of a security investigation for access to classified information for people who have no access to classified information in the first place.

As I said, a waste of resources.

OTOH, it's not like we don't have enough investigators, not like we have a backlog on security checks, right? Oops, looks like we do, and in the last few years people have been raising national security concerns because we can't clear the people we really need to clear fast enough.

I know, let's investigate a bunch of janitors to make the problem worse!

48 posted on 09/01/2007 8:32:47 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
(Sound of grey_whiskers purring...)

Cheers!

49 posted on 12/15/2007 1:50:59 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
Please note the contents of the poster on the wall in the rear of the photo.

Cheers!

50 posted on 12/15/2007 1:51:40 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson