Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jenna Bush, Engaged in a Tricky Role
Washington Post ^ | Sunday, August 26, 2007 | Robin Givhan

Posted on 08/31/2007 7:11:30 AM PDT by presidio9

Do not be fooled by Jenna Bush.

She has wrapped herself in the golden glow of celebrity. But she is something else entirely.

For almost seven years, the blond Bush twin has reveled in the trappings associated with Hollywood starlets -- from wearing made-to-order designer clothes to smiling brightly from the glossy pages of a Vogue photo spread. She has walked red carpets and swanned past velvet ropes. Like so many celebrities, she has taken on a cause -- education -- and is using her fame to stir interest and attract media attention to an upcoming book tour. She has indulged in the kind of naughty behavior that paints her as human but not necessarily in need of an intervention. As she said onstage at the 2004 Republican convention, in a scripted introduction of her mother that had all the awkward, self-deprecating humor of an Oscar segue: She and her twin, Barbara, had misbehaved when they were "young and irresponsible." Who couldn't relate to that?

Jenna even had a moment of public exasperation with the media -- her own version of a modest paparazzi meltdown. She stuck her tongue out at the press corps from behind the gray windows of the presidential limousine while campaigning with her father.

-SNIP-

Some presidential children seemed perfectly suited to the job of symbol. The image of Chelsea Clinton walking hand in hand with her parents toward a waiting helicopter, symbolically bridging the divide caused by the Monica Lewinsky scandal, is a part of history. But from the beginning, Jenna struggled with the demands of presidential symbolism. She wore a cherry-red camisole onstage when her father celebrated his reelection in 2004, prompting questions about whether first daughters should wear lingerie-like clothing on such public occasions.

-SNIP-

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: bushfamily; bushtwins; celebrity; hitpiece; jennabush; trialbymedia; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: presidio9
the blond Bush twin

Jealousy, anyone? Not to get snarky, but the author has an odd hairline.. Not that there's anyuthing wrong with that, of course.

21 posted on 08/31/2007 7:41:31 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
What a waste of paper!
22 posted on 08/31/2007 7:44:38 AM PDT by McGruff (If I can't have Cheney, Fred will have to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Holy cr#p...you should read the comments about the article.

I don't know why anybody would want to be President. The libs HATE her because she's "rich, drunk, silly, going to get a big wedding, has no talent, living off her name, didn't enlist and isn't patrolling Baghdad...etc"

It must suck to hate somebody that much....I guess I hated Clinton and what he did, so I can understand. Wow, it seems silly to look at the comments, however. I hope I never sounded like that.

weird...

23 posted on 08/31/2007 7:44:52 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Does anybody have the picture of the modest, always well-behaved Chelsea setting an example of proper public behavior? She’s at some sports event and her boyfried is nuzzling her neck. Chelsea’s nipples are raised at attention and saluting the world under her thin t-shirt. What a paragon of good behavior for a president’s daughter.


24 posted on 08/31/2007 7:51:11 AM PDT by kitkat (I refuse to let the DUers chase me off FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
She wore a cherry-red camisole onstage when her father celebrated his reelection in 2004, prompting questions about whether first daughters should wear lingerie-like clothing on such public occasions.

Did the author have any complaints about John Kerry's daughter showing up somewhere (Cannes film festival?) in the see-through dress?

25 posted on 08/31/2007 7:51:49 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

“the blond Bush twin

Jealousy, anyone?”

Don’t get me started. People will call me names but I believe a great deal of racial friction stems from just that.


26 posted on 08/31/2007 7:52:32 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
PEOPLE, PEOPLE, PEOPLE

RULES...PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!


27 posted on 08/31/2007 7:56:06 AM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac
Baffling people like her get paid for dribble like this.

Drivel is the word you are looking for, I think.

/language police

:^)

28 posted on 08/31/2007 7:56:09 AM PDT by Disambiguator (What's the temperature, Albert?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

Actually I thought you meant the photo of a bleep faced Chelsea Clinton stumbling out of a bar.


29 posted on 08/31/2007 7:56:16 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

One of the tabloids, either here or in London, ran of photos of Chelsea Clinton falling down drunk in a London club and sprawling with her crotch exposed in the backseat of a cab her boyfriend managed to pour her into.


30 posted on 08/31/2007 8:06:32 AM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
Fellow (self-appointed) "language policewoman" here....in this case, however, dribble might apply. When one foams at the mouth, I imagine it DOES dribble a bit! ;o)
31 posted on 08/31/2007 8:12:03 AM PDT by Mygirlsmom (I practice Calorie Offset Trading: I eat a candy bar then pay my kid $10 to run around the block)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
One must wonder why Ms. Givhans never mentioned the 9 months that Jenna Bush spent in Panama with UNICEF or the book she wrote promoting HIV awareness.

Never mind, that doesn't fit the agenda of leftists attempting to paint a negative about Jenna Bush or anyone in the Bush Administration.

Chelsea, on the other hand, is a good girl. She did photo ops with Mommy and Daddy even while knowing Daddy lied, cheated and made of fool of Mommy and her. And we know Chelsea didn't stick her tongue out at the press. She was only rude to the Military Personnel in the White House.

32 posted on 08/31/2007 8:14:31 AM PDT by Stars&StripesNE (Liberals are the enemy within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Contrast this story to the charming little bon mot from UPI for Chelsea Clinton:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1889363/posts

The MSM is determined to crown the ugly witch, HClinton as POTUS.

33 posted on 08/31/2007 8:16:56 AM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mygirlsmom

Drivel is the written equivalent of raw sewage, which this article resembles. Another useful word for written junk is “twaddle”, which I believe was invented by Charlotte Mason.


34 posted on 08/31/2007 8:18:59 AM PDT by Disambiguator (What's the temperature, Albert?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
>>She has indulged in the kind of naughty behavior that paints her as human but not necessarily in need of an intervention.<<

This has to be one of the most unnecessary statements ever.
The only point is to reinforce the premise that Jenna is a “bad girl”, when in fact, she is quite a lovely girl.
This entire article is total cr@p.

35 posted on 08/31/2007 8:20:05 AM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

36 posted on 08/31/2007 8:23:18 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I wonder if even 10% of the people in government these days -- including their families -- would fit any outside-the-Beltway definition of "normal."

Let's find out; TERM LIMIT THE BA$+ARD$!

37 posted on 08/31/2007 8:31:39 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

Ick. I need to pour alcohol in my eyes now.


38 posted on 08/31/2007 8:40:04 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

That’s where they add the sawdust to this bimbo reporter’s brain. She is a feckless weirdo.


39 posted on 08/31/2007 8:45:44 AM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Where’s the barf alert?


40 posted on 08/31/2007 8:47:56 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson