The notion that we can simply "cut a deal" with the despots in Beijing...is as lame and inept in reasoning as Xlinton and W's misconception of reality.
Only one man in the race that I trust to “deal” with China and it ain’t Mitt.
Maybe by partnership, he is referring to a more equal trade balance?
Or you just don't get it. What does "partnership" mean anyway? That's one of those throw away words that mean nothing. If he said "I want to sell the United States of America to the Communist Chinese", then I'd be a bit worried. But only a bit worried, because any prez that wanted to do such a thing would never get it through congress or past any decent court, so it wouldn't happen. And he wouldn't get elected in the first place.
Sun, this means in all likelihood Mitt is going to choose another Rockefeller Republican type for VP assuming he’s nominated. I had always thought Mitt would choose Hunter because he needs the military & social conservative support Hunter brings, but Hunter is too principled to make a deal with Romney now, especially over China since Hunter is the only candidate talking honestly about it.
Mitt needs a couple of more wives to keep him from stupid ideas like this.
Duncan Hunter definitely helps himself by rightfully attacking China on its unfair trade advantages. In fact, Hunter is saying the right things on all of the issues, but Hunter is still not making any progress among the majority of Republican voters. Too much attention is still being placed upon the “Kennedy wing of the Republican Party” by the MSM!
The notion that we can simply "cut a deal" with the despots in Beijing...is as lame and inept in reasoning as Xlinton and W's misconception of reality.