Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

If online advertisers had not let the situation get out of hand popup windows which spawn popup windows ad blocking would never have become such a huge thing. Irony of ironies is the both IE and Opera have features which allow ad blocking.

Whats next are they going to check my hostfile to make sure I have not pointed their advertisers at 127.0.0.1?

This is like the folks who say if you get up to use the bathroom during a commercial or use tivo you're stealing

1 posted on 08/17/2007 9:47:15 AM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: N3WBI3; ShadowAce; Tribune7; frogjerk; Salo; LTCJ; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; amigatec; Fractal Trader; ..

OSS Ping..


2 posted on 08/17/2007 9:48:52 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
The site is pretty funny, but funnier still is the link The Firefox Cult up at the top edge.
3 posted on 08/17/2007 10:07:08 AM PDT by Brujo (Quod volunt, credunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
This is like the folks who say if you get up to use the bathroom during a commercial or use tivo you're stealing

I've actually seen that argument made.

I don't want to go to any site that doesn't allow Firefox anyway. Their loss, not mine. 

4 posted on 08/17/2007 10:12:06 AM PDT by zeugma (If I eat right, don't smoke and exercise, I might live long enough to see the last Baby Boomer die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
User Agent Switcher
5 posted on 08/17/2007 10:34:13 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
If you are offended by the Mozilla Corporation's endorsement of dishonesty please contact the Mozilla Foundation and ask them to stop empowering internet theft.

Au contraire, mon frere... I Thank this site for providing me the opportunity to express my appreciation for this feature.

Unfortunately, there is no way to separate the reasonable sites (which I totally don't mind) from the abusive or the outright criminal ones which:

a) Don't allow you to return whence you came. I really hate this one!
b) Chain an endless series of popups (Grrrrrrrr!)
c) Redirect a legitimate link somewhere else.
d) Are impossible to cancel out of.

Numerous web sites exist in order to provide quality content in exchange for displaying ads. Accessing the content while blocking the ads, therefore would be no less than stealing.

In view of the above, I reject that premise permanently and in its entirety; everything that follows then makes no sense.

Perhaps no popups or cookies whatsoever should be allowed to be downloaded without a user's consent. The web owner can then decide to disconnect the user, and everyone is happy.

Garbaging up users' computers and wasting millions of man-hours cleaning up the mess is the real crime here...

Just saying.

6 posted on 08/17/2007 10:36:19 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

press 1 for ingleis,

press 2 for spanish.

ok.

interesting.

thanks.


7 posted on 08/17/2007 10:38:27 AM PDT by ken21 (28 yrs +2 families = banana republic junta. si.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

Yeah, and no fast-forwarding through commercials when you record a show either! And if you exceed the speed limit when you pass a billboard, you’re stealing eye-time from the billboard owner! And don’t even THINK about not reading every single circular in your Sunday paper!

What site(s) redirected you to this page? I may as well send those entire sites to 127.0.0.1.


9 posted on 08/17/2007 10:43:56 AM PDT by Turbopilot (iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

>>While blanket ad blocking in general is still theft, the real problem is Ad Block Plus’s unwillingness to allow individual site owners the freedom to block people using their plug-in. Blocking FireFox is the only alternative. <<

Network executives have made the same claim.
They have even suggested that one commits a crime if they get up to go to the bathroom during a commercial.

When I am provided with media whether its a book, a TV show or w web page, there is no contract that requires me to look at all the media in a particular order.

Additionally, when a web site is worthy, I support it voluntarily. maybe the other sites need to improve their content instead of bitching at users.


11 posted on 08/17/2007 10:49:43 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
I don’t block ads. Just popups and flash. Regular, static ads are ok by me.

That being said, if I was advertising on the net, I’d only buy interstitials that had to be clicked through.

13 posted on 08/17/2007 11:06:42 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

I clicked through - I notice that THEY don’t block Firefox.


14 posted on 08/17/2007 11:10:48 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
This is like the folks who say if you get up to use the bathroom during a commercial or use tivo you're stealing

The RIAA will sue you for theft of intellectual property if you get a song stuck in your head.

15 posted on 08/17/2007 11:13:45 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

Great. Now the Firefox developers can make the browser say that these websites are full of popup ads and phishing come-ons, and are therefore unaccessable. When these jackholes realize that the hit count is near zero, maybe they’ll get a clue.


16 posted on 08/17/2007 11:21:51 AM PDT by EricT. (The tree of liberty needs to be watered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm

http://someonewhocares.org/hosts

Nice sets of host redirects.


17 posted on 08/17/2007 11:23:50 AM PDT by Salo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3
Registrant:
   Danny Carlton
   Catoosa, Oklahoma 75015
   United States

   Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
   Domain Name: WHYFIREFOXISBLOCKED.COM
      Created on: 06-Aug-07
      Expires on: 06-Aug-08
      Last Updated on: 06-Aug-07
Administrative Contact:
      Carlton, Danny  godaddy@DannyCarlton.net

Danny apparently is hosted at or operates:

familynethome.com

along with his DannyCarlton.net

Having been online for over 25 years and knowing a little more than the average bear about hosting and designing websites, Mr. Carlton will soon learn that anything you do to shut out a certain percentage of your potential clients/buyers will quickly assist you in becoming either unemployed or on welfare.

Sorry, there ain't anybody who give a rat's @$$ about Danny's feelings about FireFox. Blocking people from his websites because of their browser choice is a sure way of not having anyone visit your website. It's like being p!ssed off at Google, so you block all traffic originating from them... yeah, that'll work -- real well!

I wish Danny all the best of luck... he's gonna need it.

I don't know if it's just because of the slashdot effect or not, but all of those domains either time out or take ages to load. Then again, maybe he's got his server in his bedroom, running off his DSL/Cable modem line and it only takes 4 people to max out his server/bandwidth. [grin]

21 posted on 08/17/2007 2:28:21 PM PDT by hadit2here ("Most men would rather die than think. Many do." - Bertrand Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

Aw the want stuff for free crowd is upset they didn’t get it. Where do I donate to pay for their mistreatment, or do we need to setup a government program?


22 posted on 08/17/2007 2:33:54 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: N3WBI3

This guy probably preferred DIVX over DVDs as well.


29 posted on 08/17/2007 4:43:25 PM PDT by frogjerk (If ignorance was bliss, liberals would be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson