For your consumption, fellow FReepers. Spread the word.
Hope the mods don't mind that this is in Front Page, but this is big.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: DaveLoneRanger; ImaGraftedBranch; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Paperdoll; pissant; Calpernia
Global warming ping.
A new scandal?
2 posted on
08/12/2007 10:40:54 AM PDT by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Hope the mods don't mind that this is in Front Page, but this is big.Not just big, it's HUGH!
3 posted on
08/12/2007 10:41:38 AM PDT by
JRios1968
(Faith is not believing that God can. It is knowing that God will. - Ben Stein)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
HA....the glo warmers have been exposed...their agenda is NO more...it’s dying an ugly death...HA
6 posted on
08/12/2007 10:45:11 AM PDT by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Basic References:
Lawrence Solomon's "The Deniers" (a series of articles on the view of scientists who have been labelled "Global Warming Deniers"):
Other References:
9 posted on
08/12/2007 10:50:05 AM PDT by
sourcery
(fRed Dawn: Wednesday, 5 November 2008!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Nice to see a sabermatrician with a little time on your hands.
If the data showed the we are continually getting warmer, then we need to look at the cycle. If the data shows that we are getting colder then we look at the data from a different direction.
This is how the original discoveries of climate cycles were discovered, and why climatologists can look back over many years and do basic research.
When the data is falsified in any area then the conclusions are questioned. Look at human genetics for what happens to scientists that “push” data to prove a point.
There is no realistic peer review of global warming (or cooling) because the discipline has become a religion and the reviewers are all koolaid drinkers.
Keep up the good work and don’t stop publishing. One day the Wayback Machine may be mysteriously edited and these figures will not be there. Shades of Orwell.
10 posted on
08/12/2007 10:50:38 AM PDT by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Do you really trust temperature data from more that 50 years ago to two decimal places???
Then accounting for statistical error, I don’t put much faith in these data at all.
11 posted on
08/12/2007 10:53:23 AM PDT by
Mikey_1962
(If Roger Maris got an asterisk next to his name, Bonds should get a syringe)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Tread lightly with this. I’m not sure what process they’re using since they won’t tell anyone, but this might be explainable.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
It will be interesting to hear GISS’s explanation.
13 posted on
08/12/2007 10:54:01 AM PDT by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
You have too much time on your hands.
14 posted on
08/12/2007 10:54:28 AM PDT by
Kirkwood
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Someone e-mail this to Al Gore
15 posted on
08/12/2007 10:55:02 AM PDT by
G8 Diplomat
(From my fist to Harry Reid's face)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Talk about an Inconvenient Truth!
17 posted on
08/12/2007 10:55:57 AM PDT by
hometoroost
(TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
To: Beowulf
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit beat you by a couple of days
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Thanks. However, the argument will be made that the data has been recently subjected to more accurate statistical methodology.
22 posted on
08/12/2007 11:04:39 AM PDT by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
...and its supposed to be hot all this week, too.
27 posted on
08/12/2007 11:19:44 AM PDT by
Delta 21
( MKC USCG - ret)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
To: Lancey Howard
32 posted on
08/12/2007 11:46:30 AM PDT by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
To: terjegirl; Skylus; Sundog
Ping.
Look how the official data has changed over time. They called this a Y2K bug when it was first pointed out. This is straight up Orwellian logic.
33 posted on
08/12/2007 11:54:14 AM PDT by
Sundog
(It's a good day for a catharsis.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Isn’t there a financial fraud issue here somewhere?
After all we have falsified data now.
This is growing and growing in scandal and the MSM is only trying to promote and protect the lie.
This is more blatent than the Dan Rather fraud effort yet the MSM is still denying.
(Where is the much celebrated Drudge on this? Drudgereport is the MSM’s home page.)
34 posted on
08/12/2007 12:06:25 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Want to see the way temps are collected in America? check out surfacestations.org
You will be shocked. One of them is at an airport in an area subject to JET BLAST!!! Others are next to AC units and the hot air they vent. Still others are next to barrels used to BURN trash.
SurfaceStations.org
36 posted on
08/12/2007 12:49:28 PM PDT by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson