Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple Buys CUPS
http://www.macobserver.com/article/2007/07/12.8.shtml ^ | 12:45 PM EDT, July 12th, 2007 | Jeff Gamet

Posted on 07/20/2007 1:36:17 PM PDT by N3WBI3

Apple Inc. isn't just a user of the CUPS, or Common UNIX Printing System, now the company is the owner, too. Michael Sweet, creator of CUPS, revealed on Wednesday that Apple purchased the printing system source code and brought him onboard as an employee in February 2007.

Apple uses CUPS for part of the printing system in Mac OS X, and with the purchase of the source code, that isn't likely to change.

CUPS was developed by Mr. Sweet under the GPL2/LGPL2 license, commonly used for free and open source software. He claims that Apple will continue to offer CUPS through the same licensing scheme, which means that developers should be able to use the CUPS system just as they always have.

Mr. Sweet also said that he will continue to develop and support CUPS as an Apple employee.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: apple; cups; opensource

1 posted on 07/20/2007 1:36:20 PM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3; ShadowAce; Tribune7; frogjerk; Salo; LTCJ; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; amigatec; Fractal Trader; ..
OSS Ping
2 posted on 07/20/2007 1:37:07 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Thought this might interest you..


3 posted on 07/20/2007 1:44:55 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

What do they gain by this? Don’t get me wrong. If they want to buy it and license it the same, CUPS users only stand to gain by the fact that it has good financial backing. But what does Apple get? Even if they wanted to make changes and the original coder wouldn’t accept them, they could just fork the project. If they could hire the original project head to work on it, they could have hired someone else. The only reason I can think of is that they want some major changes made and they want those changes to become part of the de facto *NIX printing platform.


4 posted on 07/20/2007 2:43:23 PM PDT by Señor Zorro ("The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"--Qui-Gon Jinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Señor Zorro

They gain the copyrights to the code, and control over future developments of the main branch. Sure the guy could fork it but he cant call it CUPS when he does. This, I think, is similar to when Redhat acquired JBoss..


5 posted on 07/20/2007 3:37:53 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Señor Zorro
The only reason I can think of is that they want some major changes made and they want those changes to become part of the de facto *NIX printing platform.

Well, sounds OK to me. I have some issues with CUPS, and if Apple can improve the system, and lets face it, Apple is pretty good at making software that is user friendly, then everyone benefits, including Apple. And Apple gets brownie points out in *nix land.

6 posted on 07/20/2007 4:06:01 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Even money says Apple wont “upgrade” the license to GPL 3, though.


7 posted on 07/20/2007 4:59:23 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

Good, The less weight GPL3 gets the better it is considerably better than its first draft but it goes so far to protect users that it starts to pinch developers..


8 posted on 07/20/2007 6:13:30 PM PDT by N3WBI3 (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson