To: Hoodlum91
That doping up a child is an answer to you makes me think you don’t have children.
40 posted on
07/12/2007 9:31:58 AM PDT by
TeddyIke
To: TeddyIke
Nope - but plan on it soon.
And they’ll be taking baby benedryl every time we step on a plane. It’s the responsible thing to do.
Your comments make me think that you don’t care about what discomfort your children cause.
41 posted on
07/12/2007 9:33:16 AM PDT by
Hoodlum91
(I support global warming.)
To: TeddyIke
I'd be cool with a child (and parent) section on an airplane. Alternately, I'd be cool with a "no kids" section for those who don't wish to sit near small children. Heck, I'd pay more for such seating. Riding next to little kids on a plane makes me miserable. The kids can't help it, they're only being kids, but in close quarters, it's not fun.
That's my honest opinion. Flame away.
52 posted on
07/12/2007 9:38:54 AM PDT by
SIDENET
(RUH-ROH)
To: TeddyIke
That doping up a child is an answer to you makes me think you dont have children. Oh, please!
Giving a kid six benedryls (estimating 3 round trips) a year is hardly "doping." I'm not suggesting that this kid needed the stuff. It's kind of hard to tell from the story. But being young does not give one the right to disturb other passengers. Parents who don't want to be responsible for the behavior of their children on an airplane shouldn't fly with them.
ML/NJ
72 posted on
07/12/2007 9:51:46 AM PDT by
ml/nj
To: TeddyIke; Hoodlum91
That doping up a child is an answer to you makes me think you dont have children. On the contrary, most parents I know have seriously considered it.
272 posted on
07/13/2007 8:45:02 AM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson