To: Daffynition

How will they recognize it in that urban jungle? Gonna be tough....
2 posted on
06/27/2007 5:19:28 AM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: Daffynition
if that investigator isn’t careful, Bigfoot just might shake his moneymaker.
5 posted on
06/27/2007 5:34:47 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: Daffynition
6 posted on
06/27/2007 5:40:42 AM PDT by
lowbridge
("The mainstream media IS the Democratic Party." - Rush Limbaugh)
To: pcottraux
7 posted on
06/27/2007 5:42:03 AM PDT by
lowbridge
("The mainstream media IS the Democratic Party." - Rush Limbaugh)
To: Daffynition
10 posted on
06/27/2007 6:53:22 AM PDT by
Mr. Brightside
(Rudy Giuliani is just another "Empty Dress Republican")
To: Daffynition
But mainstream scientists tend to dismiss the study as pseudoscience because of unreliable eyewitness accountsWhat would they consider reliable? There has been thousands upon thousands of eyewitness accounts from normal everyday people for hundreds of years.
13 posted on
06/27/2007 10:48:51 AM PDT by
lowbridge
("The mainstream media IS the Democratic Party." - Rush Limbaugh)
To: Daffynition
Living in the Northwest, talking with witnesses and going on several non-sponsored Bigfoot expeditions myself, I would give the possibility of the creature being real a pretty darn good chance. BUT - BFRO has at times made wild claims that are hard to believe. 27 out of 30 expeditions having an encounter? I don’t see bear signs 27 out of 30 outings to the back country of Washington and Oregon, and how many more thousands of bears are there than Bigfeet? Heck I have been on many a deer hunt where I would have a hard time finding proof that they exist. 27 out of 30 to me seem to be just an enticement for novice first timers to pay BFRO’s high cost for a 3-4 day expedition.
To: Daffynition
somebody awhile back already took credit for “bigfoot” and the fact it was a hoax.
18 posted on
06/27/2007 1:17:10 PM PDT by
Dick Vomer
(liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
To: Daffynition
Found it!

Now send me all the money you are going to waste looking for bigfoot.
21 posted on
06/27/2007 2:07:38 PM PDT by
CougarGA7
(You Don't Reward Someone for Breaking the Law!!! No Amnesty!)
Dr. Grover Krantz, a scientist specializing in cryptozoology, believes Bigfoot is a "gigantopithecus," a branch of primitive man believed to have existed 3 million years ago.
Update: GK died a few years ago; he didn't have a single idea for what Bigfoot is.
24 posted on
06/27/2007 10:22:37 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated June 27, 2007.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson