Expedition to look for Bigfoot evidence

YahooNews ^ | Tue Jun 26 | Staff Reporter

[theDentist]

How will they recognize it in that urban jungle? Gonna be tough....

[Daffynition]

LOL ....I see what you did there!

[Vaquero]

[Vaquero]

if that investigator isn’t careful, Bigfoot just might shake his moneymaker.

[lowbridge]

bump

[lowbridge]

bump

[Daffynition]

There may be an international conspiracy to take over the world afoot.

[gopheraj]

big ole bump

[Mr. Brightside]

[AngelesCrestHighway]

Gomer Pile in training....

[AngelesCrestHighway]

Researchers will visit the Upper Peninsula next month to search for evidence of the hairy manlike creature known as “Bigidiot” or “Sackocrap.”

[lowbridge]

But mainstream scientists tend to dismiss the study as pseudoscience because of unreliable eyewitness accounts

What would they consider reliable? There has been thousands upon thousands of eyewitness accounts from normal everyday people for hundreds of years.

[Daffynition]

I’m with you lowbie ... and the same is true for the Loch Ness monster. Someday ...someday ....

[pcottraux]

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

Sylvanic is the expedition I would like to see BFRO assist with.

[NavyCanDo]

Living in the Northwest, talking with witnesses and going on several non-sponsored Bigfoot expeditions myself, I would give the possibility of the creature being real a pretty darn good chance. BUT - BFRO has at times made wild claims that are hard to believe. 27 out of 30 expeditions having an encounter? I don’t see bear signs 27 out of 30 outings to the back country of Washington and Oregon, and how many more thousands of bears are there than Bigfeet? Heck I have been on many a deer hunt where I would have a hard time finding proof that they exist. 27 out of 30 to me seem to be just an enticement for novice first timers to pay BFRO’s high cost for a 3-4 day expedition.

[Dick Vomer]

somebody awhile back already took credit for “bigfoot” and the fact it was a hoax.

[Daffynition]

In both cases of the Nessie. Bigfoot and the Yeti, there are too many compelling sightings. I think with the technology that is available today, we’re going to find out.

While I’m not so involved as you, I think that it is dilatory to lump all these creatures together as inconceivable to exist.

[Godebert]

"I would give the possibility of the creature being real a pretty darn good chance."

I'd put the chances at over ten million to one. There is simply no credible evidence that a bigfoot type creature ever existed in North America. Besides that....factor the number of individuals required to sustain a viable population and you'd probably have numerous incidents of Bigfoot roadkill anually. When someone kills one with his pick-up truck I'll believe it. Until then, it's almost as silly as the notion that a population of pleasaurs exists in a Scottish lake.