Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing 747 Dreamlifter Achieves FAA Certification
Boeing.com ^ | June 04, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 06/05/2007 9:13:31 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative

EVERETT, June 04, 2007 -- The Boeing Dreamlifter, the specially modified 747-400 used to transport the major assemblies of the all-new Boeing 787 Dreamliner, was granted type certification on Saturday, June 2, from the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

The certification recognizes that the Dreamlifter has successfully passed all of the stringent testing and safety requirements required by the FAA. The Dreamlifter does not need to be certified by other regulatory agencies.

"This certification reflects not only the safety and reliability of the Dreamlifter but also its remarkable performance," said Scott Strode, 787 vice president of Airplane Definition and Production.

As part of the flight test program, FAA officials flew on board the Dreamlifter as it delivered major sections of the Dreamliner from partner sites around the world to the Boeing factory in Everett, Wash., for final assembly. The flights allowed the FAA to validate the overall delivery process and tools. The Dreamlifter is not certified to carry passengers beyond essential crew. The Dreamlifter completed 437 flight-test hours and 639 hours of ground testing since its first flight on Sept. 9, 2006.

With certification achieved, operation of the Dreamlifter fleet will soon be assumed by Evergreen International Airlines (EIA) of McMinnville, Ore. EIA must first complete the required New Airplane Process Document process proving it is ready to operate the aircraft. Boeing expects the transition to EIA to occur in June.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 787; aerospace; boeing; dreamlifter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: antiRepublicrat

The green color was the primer. The first plane wasn’t painted in its livery before testing in case modifications needed to be made.


21 posted on 06/05/2007 9:44:30 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

The news just keeps getting worser and worser for Airbust.


22 posted on 06/05/2007 9:48:45 AM PDT by El Gran Salseron (The World-Famous, popular DJ and FReeper Canteen Certified, Equal-Opportunity, Male-Chauvinist-Pig!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

That’s what the little mask thingys are for :>)


23 posted on 06/05/2007 9:48:51 AM PDT by irishtenor (Save the whales. Collect the whole set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ICE-FLYER

That’s one Funky lookin’ airframe.


24 posted on 06/05/2007 9:49:25 AM PDT by roaddog727 (BS does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Also, if they keep it at under 10,000 feet... :>)


25 posted on 06/05/2007 9:49:41 AM PDT by irishtenor (Save the whales. Collect the whole set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
... it delivered major sections of the Dreamliner from partner sites around the world ...

The result of outsourcing going global. When the 747 was the prime aircraft, my company (Northrop, now Northrop Grumman) fabricated the fuselage panels from just behind the cockpit to just before the tail section. Shipment to Boeing was accomplished by railroad cars modified to look something like the body of the Dreamliner.

26 posted on 06/05/2007 9:55:17 AM PDT by LantzALot (Yes, it’s my opinion. No, it’s not humble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LantzALot

But where were they fabricated? I thought it was difficult to transport fuselage sections larger than a 737-900 by rail especially when bridges, tunnels, and turns are taken into account.


27 posted on 06/05/2007 9:59:20 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

When I first saw that photo I thought it was Rosie O’Donnell’s new private plane...


28 posted on 06/05/2007 10:00:54 AM PDT by EscapedDutch (Loquendi Libertatem Custodiamus (especially from Islamofascists))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
Time to start putting in the passenger seats! You could probably get a couple thousand in if you pack them right.

Who says we can't deport all the illegals...let's load'em up and drop them off waaaaay south...

29 posted on 06/05/2007 10:03:47 AM PDT by FightforFreedomCA (I'm Bilingual - I speak English to both Men and Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LantzALot
The result of outsourcing going global.

Not really. The wings are the big thing that are mostly made over seas and those are shipped by boat from Japan. This thing is more for moving fuselage parts from places like DFW to Seattle.
30 posted on 06/05/2007 10:06:57 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FightforFreedomCA

They won’t need seats !!!!!


31 posted on 06/05/2007 10:11:38 AM PDT by irishtenor (Save the whales. Collect the whole set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
Hey looks cool why not just add another deck seat and windows and presto Airbus380 instant competition
How about nother deck, a swimming pool and basketball court is more like it. You could probably build a house inside and play Dorothy (Wizard of Oz). "We are not in Kansas anymore."

Don't forget the flags of all nations.

32 posted on 06/05/2007 10:11:48 AM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

They were fabricated in Hawthorne, CA. Yes, rail routes had to take bridges & tunnels into account — but they managed it. The program lasted 25 years, give or take.


33 posted on 06/05/2007 10:14:53 AM PDT by LantzALot (Yes, it’s my opinion. No, it’s not humble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

OK. Maybe I read too much into the statement, “... delivered ... from around the world.” BTW, who is making the fuselage parts being shipped from DFW?


34 posted on 06/05/2007 10:18:28 AM PDT by LantzALot (Yes, it’s my opinion. No, it’s not humble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

How does this plane compare in size and cost to a C-5 and a C-17? What’s that Russian plane that we are leasing equipment deliveries to the middle east? Can this plane replace these???


35 posted on 06/05/2007 10:20:20 AM PDT by Ron/GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

You telling me this has been flying over my house before being certified?


36 posted on 06/05/2007 11:13:07 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shots
why not just add another deck seat and windows and presto Airbus380 instant competition

You would need some oxygen masks as well - the back isn't pressurized.

37 posted on 06/05/2007 11:14:26 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ron/GA

It has more cargo volume than the C-5 but not the payload weight capacity. It’s unpressurized. It might be useful for transporting oversized aerospace cargoes like satellites and space probes, but it’s not useful as a military freighter. It requires lots of ground equipment to load and unload freight. There is special equipment that is necessary to open and close the tail door, because the hinges are unable to support the weight of the door.


38 posted on 06/05/2007 11:15:22 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Hmm . . . how many 737’s in a typical litter?

ROTFLMAO!

39 posted on 06/05/2007 11:15:49 AM PDT by 6ppc (Call Photo Reuters, that's the name, and away goes truth right down the drain. Photo Reuters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Is there a hybrid version?


40 posted on 06/05/2007 11:17:30 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Satan is working both sides of the street in World Socialism and World Courts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson