Posted on 06/04/2007 11:35:52 AM PDT by cryptical
At a recent backyard barbecue in Miami's Upper Eastside, a group of middle-age, middle-class folks tamely sipped berry cocktails and beers. Among them: a couple of lawyers, a couple of city administrators and an arts administrator. Somewhere between the skirt steak and the apple pie, somebody lit a joint and passed it around.
Nobody blinked. Even in mainstream, white-collar settings, smoking marijuana can be commonplace and unremarkable, like having a little wine with dinner.
Once a stamp of the arty, the marginal and the counterculture, today marijuana's popularity cuts across social boundaries. Yet several high-profile marijuana arrests have recently made headlines, highlighting the hazy double standard that exists around an illegal, potentially harmful drug that continues to encroach into the mainstream:
• In March, Lawrence Korda, 59, a Broward Circuit Court judge, was charged with openly smoking marijuana in a park in Hollywood. Korda completed a drug and alcohol program to erase the misdemeanor charge, and must take monthly random drug tests for six months and perform 25 hours of community service.
• Last month, Utpal Dighe, 31, a prosecutor in the Miami-Dade state attorney's office, was fired after police charged him with buying marijuana from a street dealer in Coconut Grove.
• Also last month, Ricky Williams, 30, erstwhile superstar running back for the Dolphins, probably ended his Miami career by testing positive for marijuana for the fifth time.
For good or ill, people from all walks smoke weed. In fact, 40.1 percent of all Americans 12 years old and up admit having tried marijuana at least once -- and 6 percent acknowledge having used it in the past month, federal drug surveys show. The FBI says 786,500 people were arrested for it in 2005, the latest figures available.
One group at least modestly turning away from marijuana is middle- and high-schoolers, ages 12 to 17. The percentage who have used pot at least once dropped from more than 20 percent in 2000 to about 17 percent in 2005, federal researchers say.
''I don't know if more people are smoking or more people are admitting it,'' said Betsy Wise, a Miami stand-up comic. Wise recently started to freelance for a New York ad agency. She confided in a co-worker that a friend was delivering pot brownies to the office -- and told him to help himself.
''When I got to the agency, all but a few of the brownies were gone,'' Wise said. ``Pretty much everyone partook, right in the office. They all greeted me with smiles. I thought that was remarkable. I would have expected maybe one or two people would have been simpatico.''
More and more, weed is cropping up in the popular culture. It isn't just the domain of hip-hop records with parental-guidance labels. On cable-TV shows like Six Feet Under,The Sopranos,Entourage and The L Word, characters have sparked up casually, the way they might sip merlot, without their marijuana use being part of any plot development or morality tale.
And it isn't just cable. On ABC's Brothers & Sisters, Sally Field's character gets high. The kids on That '70s Show often emerged from clouds of funny smoke.
GOING UPSCALE
''I think there is more of a laissez-faire attitude these days about smoking pot,'' said Jenji Kohan, creator of Showtime's Weeds, about a mother who sells marijuana to make ends meet after her husband dies unexpectedly. 'One of the things that I find interesting is that there are boutique farms that are really into their strains. It reminds me of when wine started to become really popular and people started talking about this vine and that grape. Marijuana has become more upscale. In L.A., dealers have full menus of `unique teas.' ''
Not that marijuana use is a function of wealth.
For $20 on the street, a buyer can score one-eighth ounce of low-grade marijuana from Mexico, Belize or Jamaica -- enough for four or five cigarettes. For $800, the connoisseur can acquire an ounce of exotic, extra-potent marijuana grown from modern hybrids in hydroponic labs or special soil indoors in ''grow-houses'' from Pompano Beach to Coral Gables, said James Hall, director of the Center for the Study and Prevention of Substance Abuse at Nova Southeastern University.
''It's like wine; you can buy an expensive one or you can buy the jug stuff,'' Hall said.
The truth is, for all of the marijuana possession arrests, police often look the other way, or let smokers go with friendly warnings.
At a Snoop Dogg concert at a Fort Lauderdale club a while back, a uniformed officer stood by unflinchingly as Snoop, and dozens in the audience, sent up telltale clouds.
''It's selective enforcement,'' said Miami musician Todd Thompson, who doesn't have a problem admitting that he gets high. ``At Langerado [a Broward outdoor music festival], there was smoking going on everywhere. I wouldn't do it in front of a cop, just in case. But cops don't always do something about a little marijuana smoke.''
Marijuana laws are a mishmash among the 50 states. It isn't entirely legal anywhere, but 12 states have at least partly decriminalized it, to the point that in Alaska there is no penalty for possessing an ounce or less at home.
In Florida, possession of 20 grams or less -- 28 grams would be an ounce -- is a misdemeanor punishable by a year in jail and/or a $1,000 fine; having more than 20 grams is a felony worth five years and/or a $5,000 fine.
Over the decades, debate about whether marijuana should be legalized has remained lively.
Said Howard Finkelstein, Broward County public defender and legal guru of the ''Help Me Howard'' segment on WSVN-Fox 7: 'We're making war on our own people. We take good fathers and lawyers and doctors and wives and make them outlaws. We're playing a stupid and harmful game of `gotcha.' ''
Some support for legalization comes from the belief that it's not dangerous to health, says Dr. J. Bryan Page, professor of anthropology and psychiatry and an expert on substance abuse in the University of Miami Department of Psychiatry.
''A student I knew claimed to be part of a group who all had grade-point averages over 3.6 who were very regular users,'' he said. 'She wanted me to study them to counter all the `Just say no' stuff.''
White House drug czar John Walters, not surprisingly, sees it differently. In April, his office released an analysis from the University of Mississippi's Potency Monitoring Project that said the level of THC -- the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana -- has more than doubled since 1983, from 4 percent to 8.5 percent.
`WAKE-UP CALL'
''This new report serves as a wake-up call for parents who may still hold outdated notions about the harms of marijuana,'' his announcement said.
The increased potency is from the exotic new hybrids and sophisticated indoor growing techniques, says Nova Southeastern's Hall.
Marijuana-related emergency-room visits increased from 45,000 in 1995 to 119,000 in 2002, the most recent comparison available, federal drug officials say.
Added Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse: ``Science has shown that marijuana can produce adverse physical, mental, emotional and behavioral changes, and -- contrary to popular belief -- it can be addictive.''
Norman Kent, a Fort Lauderdale lawyer and board member of NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, scoffed: ``More people died last year from eating spinach than smoking pot.''
Growing good pot is hard. Growing substandard pot is not. Much like growing good tomatoes is hard, or growing any good flowering plant is hard.
Hard may be an overstatement, but it’s much more than just throwing a seed into the ground and letting it grow.
That being said, growing tobacco isn’t all that hard either. It’s just pointless to do so since you can get an ounce of the stuff for $5-10.
Gateway to murder, apparently because the theory that it's the gateway to other drug use has been proven false repeatedly.
Better to practice conservatism, stay away from the cr@p and live a productive recreational drug free life.
Doing all of the above, thank you very much.
I guess you could say the abuse of booze and drugs like pot and all the mixtures have been the gateway to violent crime and a level of murders... Good point.
Walters is a schmuck. All this shows is that you have to smoke less to get the desired effect. Isn't this a good thing?
Google up Henry Anslinger.
Most quit smoking marijuana by their late 20's, early 30's. Even among marijuana users, these clowns are oddballs.
Robert, I know you won't believe me, but the article is accurate. I know several successful business owners, a lawyer, a mortgage banker, a doctor in residence, a local politician, a few teachers, and one individual who is somewhat of a celebrity in certain circles, who all enjoy the stick-iky on occasion.
The interesting thing is that the folks I know who never use are typically the more blue-collar types who are more exclusively into beer. Of course there are exceptions, but this is just my observation on my pretty diverse range of acquaintances.
You don't need the goovernment to "allow" you to do this. It is already a God-given right of yours.
Robert, we, as a collective society ARE DUMB! I'm not just talking about the drug war. Look at the typical inbred corrupt politician we have representing us. Look at our choices for President the last few election cycles. Look at the fact that a gun-grabbing, pro-abortion fascist is currently leading the GOP field for '08. People in general are stupid. I really don't see how you can deny that.
It's physically impossible to be a "marijuana addict".
But if the governement legalizes smoking marijuana, suddenly I’m not allowed to refuse a job to someone who engages in that particular governement supported vice, am I?
Of course you can. There are no laws against not hiring alcoholics, are there? That's the beauty of libertarianism. You can associate with whomever you want without the government dictating to you how to run your business. If you wish to drug test, you should be able to whether pot is legal or not.
I'm not sure. But alcoholism is a far cry from having a few drinks now and then. Which is itself a far cry from occasionally having a glass of wine with a fancy meal.
If I said I wasn't going to hire someone because they occasionally had a glass of wine I'm pretty sure that I'd get a lawsuit.
So if marijuana were legal, why would you not hire someone that used it in moderation? It's all about work performance. If someone drinks off work to the extent that it affects their work performance, get rid of them. Same thing with smoking pot, if their work suffers due to use during non-work hours, can them.
The only laws currently out there as far as hiring prevent you from discriminating by race. Other than that, you're free to do whatever you want.
The entire basis of your thought has changed from "Of course you can. There are no laws against not hiring alcoholics, are there?" ...to... "why would you not hire someone that used it in moderation?" Suddenly I am the one who is charged with proving that my position is acceptable to you (government in this exercise). That's what I was getting at in my first statement where I said... "I don’t mind if they legalize weed as long as at the same time they allow me to discriminate against people who smoke it for being stupid."
As soon as government says it's OK to use it, then they're going to say to me that I can't descriminate against people who use it, even if I think that it's stupid and displays poor judgement. I will be beholding to the government to tell me just how much pot a person has to smoke before they have crossed the line.
For the record, I used to smoke pot and I am an alcoholic. I've been sober for 18 years, pot-free for 20 years, and cigarette free for 17 years. I am intimately familliar with the thought processes that go along with "taking the edge off", and that's not who I'm interested in having watching my back today. That's my own opinion, and I wish for my government to allow me to implement it in my business decisions.
But they haven't done anything like that in the past. What makes you feel this would be different?
And just as a friendly reminder, your right of association is not one that can be allowed or disallowed by the government. God has granted you with that right and you are free to exercise it.
But they haven't done anything like that in the past. What makes you feel this would be different?
Really? Can I tell someone to take a hike if they want me to give them a job and I don't like something that they do? Something that used to be illegal and is now made legal by the "liberal democracy" that eats away at our Republic?
When I am an employer, must I not follow the dictates of the government when it comes to the reasons why I may choose to not hire someone?
Unless you happen to be a racist, yes, absolutely!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.