Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: doesnt suffer fools gladly

I’m sorry, but Ruby was practicing discrimination, pure and simple.

Change the players in this little drama and you can easily prove it to yourself. Simpson was convicted in a civil case not a criminal case.

I’m not saying I agree or disagree with the criminal decision, but it was in Kalifornia (wasn’t it), the same state in which a jury found Michael Jackson innocent on 12 or 13 different charges, involving child molestation, a couple of years ago.


20 posted on 05/08/2007 8:48:35 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rembrandt

“I’m sorry”

Dude slit his wife’s neck from ear to ear.


23 posted on 05/08/2007 8:55:50 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt

yeah, discriminated against an a- ho!


24 posted on 05/08/2007 8:57:44 PM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt
Simpson was convicted in a civil case not a criminal case.

Simpson would have been acquitted in the criminal case even if he had confessed in the courtroom and there had been clear videotape of him committing the near-beheadings.

29 posted on 05/08/2007 9:09:12 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt
There's no evidence that "discrimination" is involved until you prove to me that an equally notorious white person was served by the owner of this establishment.

If I owned a restaurant,I'd deny service to (among others) either of the Clintons,either of the Kerrys,the entire Kennedy family,OJ,Michael Jackson and Peyton Manning.

32 posted on 05/08/2007 9:12:58 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt
I’m sorry, but Ruby was practicing discrimination, pure and simple.

As is, or should be, his right. If a smelly, poorly dressed man came in he could/would refuse him service. Well, metaphorically, OJ smelled pretty bad to him. And, based on the customer's responses, he was doing for their benefit also.

33 posted on 05/08/2007 9:14:54 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt
I’m sorry, but Ruby was practicing discrimination, pure and simple.

And why can't a person "discriminate"?

34 posted on 05/08/2007 9:15:22 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt
I’m sorry, but Ruby was practicing discrimination, pure and simple.

So? Not all 'discrimination' is bad. I'll tell you this, if I am in that restaurant and they were to serve that murderer, I would leave and tell them why I was leaving. Their choice, the murderer or me, one of is going. I bet I would not be alone as I left.

Wasn’t proven

Yes it was. He was found 'not guilty', he was not found 'innocent'. The man killed her, you cannot seriously believe otherwise. This was a 'jury nullification case by a racist jury, pure and simple.

47 posted on 05/08/2007 9:57:46 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("The military Mission has long since been accomplished" -- Harry Reid, April 23, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt

Yep, discrimination, pure and simple.
AND PERFECTLY LEGAL!


55 posted on 05/08/2007 10:10:54 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt

And your point is.....?


76 posted on 05/08/2007 10:41:12 PM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt
The owner [said] “I didn’t want to serve him because of my convictions of what he’s done to those families,”

Management can reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. They don't have to give a reason. The man's reason makes sense to me. Did OJ pay up on the civil judgments to the families of the victims? At the very least, the manager was within his rights to refuse service because he didn't want his business to be associated with such a low life. or to subject his patrons to OJ, or to continue to activate his gag reflex.

In its very definition, refusing service to someone IS and HAS TO 8E discriminatory. This is sometimes essential and not always negative in terms of its overall effect on society.

Merriam-Webster online
discrimination
1 a : the act of discriminating b : the process by which two stimuli differing in some aspect are responded to differently
2 : the quality or power of finely distinguishing

77 posted on 05/08/2007 10:41:16 PM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt
"I’m sorry, but Ruby was practicing discrimination, pure and simple."

That's right. Mr. Ruby discriminates against murderers, especially ones who are rightly detested by millions of people. And don't start spouting again about how Simpson "wasn't convicted." Everybody, including the jury that let him off, knows Simpson murdered Ron and Nicole.

82 posted on 05/08/2007 10:58:04 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt
I’m sorry, but Ruby was practicing discrimination, pure and simple.

Don't think so! Private business. Where's the necessary involvment of the State. We all discriminate in one way or another. It's not illegal. But it is for the State. No State action, no discrimination.

87 posted on 05/08/2007 11:33:19 PM PDT by navyblue (<u>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt
I’m sorry, but Ruby was practicing discrimination, pure and simple.

Discrimination is an absolutely legal practice. "Racial Discrimination" is not. OJ was ejected for being a scumbag, which is a right that the owner openly states for all to see at the premise.

Discrimination is a human right, IMHO. When you get into motives it may lean one way or another, but everyone practices it in some form.

OJ got called out for being a scumbag, this time.

93 posted on 05/09/2007 2:32:17 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson