Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple delays Leopard until October because of iPhone
Macworld ^ | 04/12/2007 | Peter Cohen

Posted on 04/12/2007 2:38:12 PM PDT by JohnSheppard

Apple on Thursday released a statement noting that Mac OS X v10.5 “Leopard” won’t be released until October. The cause of the delay? The iPhone.

“iPhone has already passed several of its required certification tests and is on schedule to ship in late June as planned. We can’t wait until customers get their hands (and fingers) on it and experience what a revolutionary and magical product it is,” reads a statement published by the company.

Getting the iPhone ready for its June launch has had an unintended consequence, however: QA and “some key software engineering” resources allocated to Mac OS X needed to be diverted from their work to finish the iPhone. As a result, Apple won’t release Leopard at its Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in June, as it had first planned.

“While Leopard’s features will be complete by then, we cannot deliver the quality release that we and our customers expect from us. We now plan to show our developers a near final version of Leopard at the conference, give them a beta copy to take home so they can do their final testing, and ship Leopard in October. We think it will be well worth the wait. Life often presents tradeoffs, and in this case we’re sure we’ve made the right ones,” reads the statement.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: apple; iphone; leopard; macosx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2007 2:38:17 PM PDT by JohnSheppard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

ping


2 posted on 04/12/2007 2:40:51 PM PDT by JohnSheppard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnSheppard

This sucks... I was counting on Leopard’s new iCal and CalDav features for the office. SOHO Organizer really sucks.


3 posted on 04/12/2007 2:41:35 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnSheppard

Feh.


4 posted on 04/12/2007 2:51:09 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnSheppard
So Mac OS X 10.5 will miss the peak of the back-to-school buying season - but it should be in good shape for Christmas.

Fortunately, the current 10.4 release is still an excellent operating system - and certainly better than Windows Vista.

5 posted on 04/12/2007 3:05:50 PM PDT by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1234; 6SJ7; Abundy; Action-America; af_vet_rr; afnamvet; akatel; Alexander Rubin; Amadeo; ...
Rats!

PING.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

6 posted on 04/12/2007 5:18:34 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Was I right two weeks ago or is this FUD...


7 posted on 04/12/2007 5:48:28 PM PDT by tubebender (Worry gives small problems big shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

Yes, the rumours were right about the delay, but I still doubt that the reason is because of Vista.


8 posted on 04/12/2007 5:58:06 PM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr

It’s more likely that the figured out they weren’t losing any sales to Vista, so why hurry.


9 posted on 04/12/2007 6:09:04 PM PDT by AZLiberty (Tag to let -- 50 cents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Yeah, really. Rats. Speaking as someone who’s a happy Mac OS customer and who will probably never be an iPhone customer.


10 posted on 04/12/2007 6:10:32 PM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
but I still doubt that the reason is because of Vista.

Does not compute. Where does Vista fit in on the delay?

11 posted on 04/12/2007 6:13:10 PM PDT by tubebender (Worry gives small problems big shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
Was I right two weeks ago or is this FUD...

You were right... but the reason is different.

12 posted on 04/12/2007 6:24:47 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
Where does Vista fit in on the delay?

Two weeks ago, the purported reason for the delay was to make OS X.5 Leopard's version of Boot Camp Vista compliant.

13 posted on 04/12/2007 6:26:25 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
You are correct. But it is a weaker excuse than the Vista hang up. They should be pushing the release of Leopard to capitalize on Vista’s short comings...
14 posted on 04/12/2007 7:08:04 PM PDT by tubebender (Worry gives small problems big shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnSheppard

I’m bummed out by this - I was supposed to get complimentary Leopard client & server as part of my Apple Developer Program - and that was a big part of my justification of the fee.

But I’m also not surprised. I’m running Leopard right now as I type this, and while I can’t say much (NDA), I’ll say that my impressions are the same as the WWDC keynote: there’s a lot of good & important stuff under the covers (full 64 bit, fully UNIX compliant, opportunities with Core Animation and system-wide to-do lists, etc.), but the “day-to-day” operations with the Finder and basic apps are exactly the same.

Apple really needs those “Top Secret” features that Steve withheld from the keynote in Leopard, and then needs time to debug the whole thing before shipping. Disclosure of features at mid-June WWDC = 4.5 months to debug before end of October. That’s cutting it close. I hope they disclose the new features before that, so they have 6 months to wrap up.


15 posted on 04/12/2007 7:39:42 PM PDT by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Many times better...

Heck, Vista’s so bad, I’d take OS 9 over it...8^)


16 posted on 04/12/2007 8:28:45 PM PDT by rzeznikj at stout (Boldly Going Nowhere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnSheppard
Disappointing. But better to wait till fall than launch something half-baked like Vista.

Vista is still screwed after seven years. Leopard will make the 64-bit transition, get a new GUI, UNIX 2003, ZFS, Time Machine, revamped OpenGL/CoreImage, CoreAnimation, new simplified Quicktime AP, resolution-independence and other great new features in a fraction of that time.

I notice M$ is closing down WinXP OEM licenses forcibly at year end, something Dell and HP don't seem to like. Vista has been a disaster for them. Also very few upgraders though we've seen a few non-technical FReepers buying Vista.
17 posted on 04/12/2007 8:40:32 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

SOHO Organizer sucks? Is it worse than Entourage?

iCal and Mail never integrated and you could not trade/link messages, appointments, etc. with Outlook and other Windoze email clients and PIMs. Maybe Leopard versions will be better but will they be good enough?

Does anyone know of a really good Mac PIM that can work with Windoze and now Vista products?


18 posted on 04/12/2007 9:15:06 PM PDT by Amadeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnSheppard

Looks like this story was spot on.

[rimshot!]


20 posted on 04/12/2007 11:24:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Monday, April 2, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson