Posted on 03/19/2007 2:18:25 AM PDT by Man50D
He'll be a real Weiner with the "glass parking lot" crowd.
Savage ping
Well, I'm part of that crowd. And who'd thunk it since I'm an african american female, and from Washington, DC to boot.
L
Right, plus the 5 million who would vote for him for president. By the way, I wouldn't necessarily vote for him, but some of the things he advocates are exactly my sentiments and have been long before he stated them.
Tanks? It would be more effective to put a 50 cal every 500 yards.
I have long felt the same way.
We're either serious, or we're not.
There is no middle ground.
L
A pinch of humility is a necessary ingredient for successful national leadership. This rules out Michael Savage - unfortunately (because I really like the idea of tanks, *AND* 50 cals!) :)
Ummmmm. That still leaves a bit of a gap.
Many other talk show hosts think Savage is nuts. I do not.
General "Blackjack" Pershing and his troops were sent to stop border incursions almost 100 years ago.
I can only infer that the reason our politicians have stood by and allowed this invasion is fear of losing votes from illegals. Disgusting.
Wait isnt' this the ultra liberal position on Iraq? Aren't we supposed to withdraw all troops and then when the Terrorists create multiple training camps. Iraqi govt collapses and Iran and Saudi Arabia are at open war and a mushroom cloud goes up over Tel Aviv thats when were supposed to say enough already and make the entire region a glass parking lot. I mean typically, historically speaking that is the correct Democrat response ala Harry Truman nuking not one but 2 Japanese cities to in his estimation bring about a quick end to a war that may well have lasted 10 more years or more... Tokyo was next too...
Tanks on the border and exterminate our enemies? Sounds perfect to me rather then playing politics with both.
Tanks on the border to Mexico would be better than what we have now! Not that I would ever vote for Savage, but someone needs to do something QUICK about our borders!!!
Not sure what you mean.
Tanks on the border is the latest display of symbolism over substance. The tanks are useless unless there is the political will to command the military to literally pull the trigger. Moreover, I agree that .50 cals and M-60s at closer intervals will work better and cost less.
That's unpossible--we were out of nukes after Nagasaki.
Nuking Japan twisted Truman's brain forever. During the Korean war he insisted we drop leaflets over North Korean factories 48 hours ahead of time, warning them of our impending bombing. We've been fighting wars Truman style ever since.
Weiner does say many things that I agree with, however, he usually can't talk for more than a half hour before he says something so incredibly stupid I have to turn him off. He may have a Phd., but he has the reasoning skills of a ten year-old.
Good for you!
That "crowd" that you have joined is growing by the day.
At last I can say "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!" and know that I'm not alone.
Huh? What great president has lacked a monumental ego?
I've listened to his show off and on since his days as a fill-in at KGO, and I have to agree with that. I also could not bring myself to vote for a guy who lacks control over his emotions to the degree that I'd worry about him trying to launch strategic weapons out of a fit of personal rage.
I agree that we need a doer and not a talker in the White House who brooks no BS, but I see Savage as a bit of a loose cannon. I'd rather not have a President who has to be told by his subordinates, "I cannot comply, that is an unlawful order, sir".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.