To: grey_whiskers
During the time you speak of, there was no industry--everything was at a handcart/oxen/small farmer level.
Not really -- both the countries had thriving "industries" -- they manufactured textiles (silks from China, cotton from India), intricate jewellery and also had farms that supplied the world with spices etc. It wasn't as simple as largest population, largest GDP. These two were also at the forefront of education, then they stagnated for various reasons. The US should NOT allow the same to happen to itself.
14 posted on
03/12/2009 4:09:12 AM PDT by
Cronos
(Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
To: Cronos
Not really -- both the countries had thriving "industries" -- they manufactured textiles (silks from China, cotton from India), intricate jewellery and also had farms that supplied the world with spices etc. Sorry, poor writing on my part. I was thinking modern industry, i.e. mechanization.
These two were also at the forefront of education, then they stagnated for various reasons. The US should NOT allow the same to happen to itself.
We need to reinstate compulsory Latin and plane geometry classes like the Brits used to teach. That's how they took over the world.
Cheers!
15 posted on
03/12/2009 4:03:38 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson