Posted on 02/20/2007 10:56:28 AM PST by Echo Talon
Microsoft releases the latest edition of Virtual PC
Microsoft has released Virtual PC 2007 1.0 to customers. The program allows Windows users to run multiple operating systems at once from a single physical computer. Users can also easily switch back and forth between operating systems with the click of a mouse.
New features included with the latest release of Microsoft Virtual PC include:
The following operating systems are officially supported on host machines:
The following operating systems are officially supported as guests:
There is also unofficial support for MS DOS 6.22, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME and Windows NT 4.0 Workstation.
Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 is available as a free download in both 32-bit and 64-bit versions. You can view the release notes for the software application here.
Actually it's pretty simple. You didn't "buy" OSX, you bought a license to use it under certain circumstances, but Apple still owns it. If you decide to access it, in a manner that Apple doesn't approve of, you're hacking their property, not modding your own.
Yes you did, and it bugs him too because he believes in the original meaning of a hacker because he was one.
Don't forget that all licenses and contracts are subject to the restrictions of law. Terms can, and have been, found unenforceable.
It's still very basic, without the cool GUI and stuff. It's the OS that inspired Linus when writing Linux. But the great thing about Minix is its size and the extreme microkernel architecture (the kernel is only a couple thousand lines), which makes it almost impossible to crash.
Yes, I understand their license agreement, but I still don't agree with it.
It doesn't sound like it passes "fair use" laws and such.
LOL, can't wait till you pull out "the 180 day rule for criminal prosecution" in defense of your Russian hacker heroes again.
Echo Talon= Über Geek Light Padawan, errr ummmm... ouch, my brain hurts... ;)
It requires a little bit of respect for someone else's property, and not being consumed with your own wants.
You do hate it when I pull out the actual law in contrast to your wild accusations.
Or, rather, not feeling the need to exercise your rights. I'm sure those at Network World valued their 1st Amendment rights more than McAfee's copyright when they published a review without first getting permission as they EULA stated they must. The court agreed with them. Remember, copyright is not absolute, and it cannot trump other rights.
No I think it's hilarious how far you're willing to go to make up BS in defense of criminal Russian hackers. Remember when you lied for months claiming Russian hackers were writing software in use by the US DoD? Only to admit several months later it was all a premeditated lie? Then tried to claim your lies were not actually defending Russian hackers, but somehow proving I was the fraud instead? LOL, I do, and bet you start defending them with BS all over again now. Go right ahead, it's a riot every time.
And you have yet to show how their actions could be criminal according to the law and the information in the article.
Then tried to claim your lies were not actually defending Russian hackers, but somehow proving I was the fraud instead?
That was the whole purpose of it, to play on your paranoia of Russians and ignorance of security. It must have really ticked you off, because you're still mad about it even months later. You lost, get over it.
I showed you were full of BS when you repeatedly claimed the Russian hackers couldn't have possibly been criminal since they didn't distribute OSX along with their hacks by showing a criminal case against other Russians who were only distributing hacks. That's when you reached deep in your bag of BS and trotted out "the 180 day rule" on behalf of your Russian criminal heroes. LOL that one still cracks me up.
If you want to laugh at the law you pretend to support, that's fine. But your post shows you still have no understanding of the applicable law. It's not BS, it's the law, and you don't know it despite being shown it. That's not just ignorance, that's willful ignorance.
Says the guy who repeatedly insisted they couldn't be criminals since they weren't distributing OSX but only the hacks. All you've done is repeatedly lie and twist the law to defend foreign criminals, now you're down to name calling since you lost on the facts long ago, and have even admitted to knowingly making lies about the US DoD on their behalf. Most dishonorable of all you appear to have posted those lies about the US DoD from your job supposedly supporting the DoD. Yet, here you are again, still defending your foreign criminal heroes, more precious to you than anything else we can find.
And I showed you the applicable law according to the information in the article, which you have not been able to rebut. All you could do is bring up a different case that doesn't apply and a standard threat C&D.
You should just admit when the facts are against you, but you won't. All you do is use more lies to cover up for the lies you make to cover for previous lies, and so on. I've listed them, and you almost never retract.
Oh yeah, I remember now, the letter from Apple I showed threatening criminal prosecution of your foreign criminal hacker heroes, which you immediately dismissed as quote "BS". Obviously I have better things to do than remember all the details of the lies and distortions you continue to perpetrate on behalf of the foreign criminals you idolize, but thanks for the reminder LOL.
meh... he does not believe in fair use, consumers have no rights not given by corporations..
I don't know, IF you buy something you should be able to use it....(re:Vista Home basic and virtualization)and IF you notice Swordmaker and others complained about that.... so whats different about me complaining about OSX not being allow to be installed on the PC? at least Windows does have a version that can be used on the mac...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.