Skip to comments.
Theron tipped for Anna Nicole role
The Times ^
| February 17, 2007
| James Bone
Posted on 02/17/2007 8:33:53 AM PST by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1000 years from now, archaeologists will wonder what all the fuss was about and unearth her body - they will be surprised to find two large bags of silicon and wonder what ceremonial purpose they served.
Regards, Ivan
1
posted on
02/17/2007 8:33:54 AM PST
by
MadIvan
To: Mrs Ivan; odds; DCPatriot; Texican; Watery Tart; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; ...
2
posted on
02/17/2007 8:34:52 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
and shock jock Howard Stern will play his "namesake" no doubt
3
posted on
02/17/2007 8:36:32 AM PST
by
ken5050
(The 2008 winning ticket: Rudy/Newtie)
To: MadIvan
OMG! Anna Nicole. The Movie.
4
posted on
02/17/2007 8:37:57 AM PST
by
GVnana
(Former Alias: GVgirl)
To: MadIvan
Why Not? She has so many different looks!
5
posted on
02/17/2007 8:38:24 AM PST
by
TommyDale
(What will Rudy do in the War on Terror? Implement gun control on insurgents and Al Qaeda?)
To: GVnana
They're trying to turn a B-list celebrity into an A-list legend.
Won't work.
Regards, Ivan
6
posted on
02/17/2007 8:40:03 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
A movie about NOTHING! Just like Seinfeld.
7
posted on
02/17/2007 8:40:09 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(Acts 17:11 also known as sola scriptura.)
To: MadIvan
I've never heard of her before, but I googled her image:
One thing I do know about though, is Miss Therzon seems to have itty bitty beanbags, and Anna Nicole didn't have no little beanbags. Color me disappointed.
Owl_Eagle
If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.
8
posted on
02/17/2007 8:40:22 AM PST
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Owl_Eagle
Digital effects, perhaps?
Regards, Ivan
9
posted on
02/17/2007 8:41:12 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
Why would a movie about ANS be made, much less watched?????
10
posted on
02/17/2007 8:41:21 AM PST
by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: Owl_Eagle
Inflate to 80 pounds per square inch.
11
posted on
02/17/2007 8:42:09 AM PST
by
TommyDale
(What will Rudy do in the War on Terror? Implement gun control on insurgents and Al Qaeda?)
To: LiteKeeper
I suspect part of it has to do with the fact that Hollywood has completely run out of ideas. I'm saying this after having just seen "Hannibal Rising", so perhaps I'm a bit more jaded than usual.
Regards, Ivan
12
posted on
02/17/2007 8:42:30 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
They are going to have to stuff her bra with army helmets for her to pull off that role.
13
posted on
02/17/2007 8:45:26 AM PST
by
Dreagon
To: MadIvan
The scary part is that Howard K. Stern is directing!
14
posted on
02/17/2007 8:47:07 AM PST
by
GVnana
(Former Alias: GVgirl)
To: MadIvan
Charlize is going to have to muscle-up for that role....
It mystifies me why a talented actress would want to play the part of a scandal-mag 'celebrity'.
15
posted on
02/17/2007 11:19:01 AM PST
by
Tallguy
To: MadIvan
This is so incredibly sad ... a mess of a life ... anyone that met her appeared to bed her ... then her son died ... I have little doubt that she wanted to commit suicide. How could she have had any self respect or dignity when her enabling "friends" let her desire to die come true? She was a mess!
I just hope that poor little baby gets a good home AWAY from these enablers WITHOUT the money. Then the baby has a chance to be loved for who she is not what she HAS $$$$. Ideally it would be nice if she knew NOTHING about her biological mother ... no one to look up to or be an example to emulate. So sad.
I actually hope lawyer fees eat up her "estate" so the wrong reasons to want Danielynn don't happen. All this baby is now is a bundle of money to enrich someone ELSE'S life till she is of age.
16
posted on
02/17/2007 2:34:12 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: GVnana
"The scary part is that Howard K. Stern is directing!"
Are you SERIOUS?
Even after her death, he still wants to PROFIT from HER?
He's an attorney all right but didn't work. Anna supported the slouch.
17
posted on
02/17/2007 2:36:14 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: justshutupandtakeit
I have intentionally omitted to provide for my spouse and other heirs, including future spouses and children and other descendants now living and those hereafter born or adopted.
I told ya, child support. Better rethink that claim. LOL!
To: Shimmer128
You know what's especially sad about that exclusionary statement?
She felt she had NO ONE but her son Daniel.
Yeah, ole Howard was supposed to be the executor and would get some money but the nearly all went to her son. That's sad. It appears ole Howard K. Stern was just a necessary evil to carry out her wishes - he was NOT bequeathed ANYTHING other than the fee for carrying out her wishes.
It should be interesting to see who really winds up with what. They should all be ashamed of themselves ... instead they're practically crawling out of the woodwork to PROFIT from her death and be the "father" of this child.
Someone mentioned that ole Rosie, the male hating lesbian thought her SON was the father. I personally doubt that but leave it to another disturbed person to come up with that.
19
posted on
02/17/2007 2:53:19 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: MadIvan
Excellent casting! One bimbo playing another!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson