To: justshutupandtakeit
I have intentionally omitted to provide for my spouse and other heirs, including future spouses and children and other descendants now living and those hereafter born or adopted.
I told ya, child support. Better rethink that claim. LOL!
To: Shimmer128
You know what's especially sad about that exclusionary statement?
She felt she had NO ONE but her son Daniel.
Yeah, ole Howard was supposed to be the executor and would get some money but the nearly all went to her son. That's sad. It appears ole Howard K. Stern was just a necessary evil to carry out her wishes - he was NOT bequeathed ANYTHING other than the fee for carrying out her wishes.
It should be interesting to see who really winds up with what. They should all be ashamed of themselves ... instead they're practically crawling out of the woodwork to PROFIT from her death and be the "father" of this child.
Someone mentioned that ole Rosie, the male hating lesbian thought her SON was the father. I personally doubt that but leave it to another disturbed person to come up with that.
19 posted on
02/17/2007 2:53:19 PM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson