To: AndrewC; Fred Nerks; LeGrande; Miles the Slasher; SunkenCiv; Soaring Feather
A not so constant constant... PING!
If you want on or off the Electric Universe Ping List, Freepmail me.
2 posted on
02/11/2007 2:50:30 AM PST by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
To: Swordmaker
"[E]stablishment scientists actually proceed on the belief that theories tell you what is true and not true."
3 posted on
02/11/2007 2:57:06 AM PST by
BenLurkin
To: Swordmaker
4 posted on
02/11/2007 3:06:34 AM PST by
x_plus_one
(As long as we pretend to not be fighting Iran in Iraq, we can't pretend to win the war.)
To: Swordmaker
has determined that the Hubble constant (the rate at which the universe is expanding) is 15% lower than the accepted value. His measurements have a margin of error of 6%. And what was the previously advertised margin of error? Its all well and good to include assumptions in science, but giant red flags need to be attached when set before the general public.
5 posted on
02/11/2007 5:28:59 AM PST by
SampleMan
(Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
To: Swordmaker
It's worth keeping in mind that the red shift as an index of the expansion of the universe presumes that the velocity of light is constant, which measurements made over only the last 150 years don't provide enough data points to prove. While c is observably 'invariant', that's not quite the same thing as 'constant'.
6 posted on
02/11/2007 5:41:13 AM PST by
Grut
To: Swordmaker
Because traditional astronomers never question traditional assumptions (and appear not to recognize they even have any), they cannot be expected to mention that their margin of erroneous assumption is somewhere around 500%. B.S. All real scientist are continuously aware of, and constantly question their assumptions. If scientist seem arrogant or cocksure occasionally, it is in response to critics who don't understand the assumptions or even realize that there are assumptions.
7 posted on
02/11/2007 5:59:53 AM PST by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(When I search out the massed wheeling circles of the stars, my feet no longer touch the earth)
To: Swordmaker; RadioAstronomer
Because traditional astronomers never question traditional assumptions
Never is a long time to an Astronomer
8 posted on
02/11/2007 6:12:16 AM PST by
grjr21
To: RadioAstronomer; Swordmaker
To: Swordmaker
Space plasmas routinely develop double layers that accelerate electrons (and positive ions) to high speeds. "It looks like...a FLUX CAPACITOR!" :-)
Full Disclosure: Meanwhile, down here on Earth, double layer theory at electrodes is kinda interesting :-)
11 posted on
02/11/2007 6:43:33 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
15 posted on
02/11/2007 4:17:54 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Saturday, February 3, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson