Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/11/2007 2:49:37 AM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC; Fred Nerks; LeGrande; Miles the Slasher; SunkenCiv; Soaring Feather
A not so constant constant... PING!

If you want on or off the Electric Universe Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 02/11/2007 2:50:30 AM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
"[E]stablishment scientists actually proceed on the belief that theories tell you what is true and not true."
3 posted on 02/11/2007 2:57:06 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

ping


4 posted on 02/11/2007 3:06:34 AM PST by x_plus_one (As long as we pretend to not be fighting Iran in Iraq, we can't pretend to win the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
has determined that the Hubble constant (the rate at which the universe is expanding) is 15% lower than the accepted value. His measurements have a margin of error of 6%.

And what was the previously advertised margin of error? Its all well and good to include assumptions in science, but giant red flags need to be attached when set before the general public.

5 posted on 02/11/2007 5:28:59 AM PST by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
It's worth keeping in mind that the red shift as an index of the expansion of the universe presumes that the velocity of light is constant, which measurements made over only the last 150 years don't provide enough data points to prove. While c is observably 'invariant', that's not quite the same thing as 'constant'.
6 posted on 02/11/2007 5:41:13 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Because traditional astronomers never question traditional assumptions (and appear not to recognize they even have any), they cannot be expected to mention that their margin of erroneous assumption is somewhere around 500%.

B.S. All real scientist are continuously aware of, and constantly question their assumptions. If scientist seem arrogant or cocksure occasionally, it is in response to critics who don't understand the assumptions or even realize that there are assumptions.

7 posted on 02/11/2007 5:59:53 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (When I search out the massed wheeling circles of the stars, my feet no longer touch the earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker; RadioAstronomer
Because traditional astronomers never question traditional assumptions


Never is a long time to an Astronomer
8 posted on 02/11/2007 6:12:16 AM PST by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer; Swordmaker

You Who.


10 posted on 02/11/2007 6:29:30 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Space plasmas routinely develop double layers that accelerate electrons (and positive ions) to high speeds.

"It looks like...a FLUX CAPACITOR!" :-)

Full Disclosure: Meanwhile, down here on Earth, double layer theory at electrodes is kinda interesting :-)

11 posted on 02/11/2007 6:43:33 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

not a ping, just adding.

· String Theory ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog messages · bookmark ·

15 posted on 02/11/2007 4:17:54 PM PST by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Saturday, February 3, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson