Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Object found in parking lot ID'd as Civil War-era artillery shell
Star-Telegram ^ | 1-12-07 | DOMINGO RAMIREZ JR

Posted on 01/12/2007 9:07:07 AM PST by Dysart

EULESS — A metal object found at a business parking lot last week has been identified as a 140-year-old artillery shell from the Civil War era, authorities said Friday.

The live round was scheduled to be defused in a few days by the members of the Northeast Explosive Response Team, who retrieved the shell on Jan. 5 from property at Simtek Inc.

Authorities believe the shell could still contain black powder.

“It still had a fuse cap at the end of it,” said Euless fire investigator Vernon Gilmore.

A military official identified the shell this week after being shown photographs of it.

The shell was used with Parrott cannons in the Civil War, authorities said. No weapon was found with the shell.

“There was Civil War activity in Texas, but how that shell got here we don’t know,” Gilmore said. “It could have just fallen from a wagon traveling this area, or a collector could have just lost it.”

The shell was found about 12:50 p.m. on Jan. 5 in the 1500 block of Royal Parkway.

An employee discovered the shell several days before Jan. 5 while doing landscaping work and left it near the parking lot but never reported it. Another employee found it Jan. 5 and Simtek officials called authorities.

Firefighters evacuated the business after they arrived on the scene as explosive experts attempted to remove the 20-pound shell.

At first, a robot was used, but the shell was too heavy for the robot to lift, authorities said.

An explosive team member then grabbed the shell and placed it in a container.

No injuries were reported.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: americanhistory; antique; civilwar; civilwarshell; milhist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Dysart

Is this the actual shell?

If it is and they believe they can handle it in this fashion why are they bothering to defuse it?


41 posted on 01/12/2007 2:46:09 PM PST by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

The shell has not been fired and is not a dud. It is also not a solid piece--bolt--so is likely still filled with powder. Got to wonder if any pressure is being applied by the upper hand in the photo.


42 posted on 01/12/2007 2:50:19 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

The Star-Telegram photographer(Laurie L. Ward) has her name attached to the picture so I certainly believe that it is THE shell.

Your second question is a very good one. I don't know what they are thinking.


43 posted on 01/12/2007 2:50:22 PM PST by Dysart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dysart
At first, a robot was used, but the shell was too heavy for the robot to lift...

Had to be a little embarrassing for the robot.

44 posted on 01/12/2007 2:54:51 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
No weapon was found with the shell.

Hilarious. What a find it would have been if there were. Come to think of it, the article never states that a Union artillery man wasn't there. How do we know?!

45 posted on 01/12/2007 2:56:17 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Got to wonder if any pressure is being applied by the upper hand in the photo.

I don't think they used contact detonators, did they? Weren't they time fuses?

46 posted on 01/12/2007 4:30:04 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dysart

I reckon the South is fixin' to rise again.


47 posted on 01/12/2007 4:40:48 PM PST by SamAdams76 (I'm 70 days from outliving Steve Irwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nnn0jeh; TR Jeffersonian; Cailleach

ping


48 posted on 01/12/2007 6:05:24 PM PST by kalee (No burka for me....EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

I didn't know the world's finest quarterback had a fort named for him. 8^)


49 posted on 01/12/2007 6:10:56 PM PST by j_tull (Massachusetts, the Gay State. Once the leader of the American Revolution, now leading its demise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: j_tull

Did they ever say he had an arm like a "Rifle"?

Like a Naval rifle.


50 posted on 01/12/2007 6:42:59 PM PST by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Impact fuses were rare, both sides generally used timed fuses that depended on the muzzle flash from the gun to light them. The fuses were only put in just before loading, so the shell probably has a wooden plug (like a cork in a bottle) to keep the powder from spilling out.

As long as the shell is still sealed and not heated a lot, it is relatively safe to handle. The problem is that the powder charge inside is likely to be "live" and may have been destabilized by moisture over the years. Several ordnance experts have been hurt when shells they were drilling into exploded when the contents were exposed to air.


51 posted on 01/12/2007 7:10:23 PM PST by RebelBanker (May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Deguello
They said it was in the landscaping. It could of risen up particularly after the ground was turned up. Things like that happen a lot around South Arlington(city on the Southern border of Euless). It use to be a live artillery firing range during WWII. The Army Corp of Engineers have been continually busy working there as more housing development is built out.
52 posted on 01/13/2007 12:12:48 AM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"The wagon driver would have not been pleased if this fell off his wagon, so it was probably part of an ammo dump of small size."

The City of Fort Worth(named after General Worth of Mexican War fame) would of still been a functioning frontier fort at the time. So it is possible it could be a shipment to the fort or maybe a surrounding smaller defensive position.
53 posted on 01/13/2007 12:15:18 AM PST by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

fyi, i visited Ft Fisher on Friday last with my beloved "duckie".

free dixie,sw

54 posted on 01/14/2007 12:58:16 PM PST by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson