Posted on 11/17/2006 11:58:32 PM PST by allahisamoongod
I. Introduction. This piece is written in response to Reply to Robert Moreys Moon-God Allah Myth: A Look at the Archaeological Evidence, dated 26 Jun 2006, authored by Saifullah, Juferi & David and published on the Islamic Awareness website. This response is more focused on the issues in question rather than on defending Moreys scholarship. While a few of Saifullahs criticisms of Morey's work are addressed, Morey may wish to issue another pamphlet like the one he wrote answering a prior critic, Shabir Ally.[1][snip]
VIII. Conclusion. Most of this essay is extracted from the Critique of the Revisionist View on the Sun- and Moon-gods in Southern Arabia section of Yoel Natans book Moon-o-theism (volume I, pages 338-359, section: Critique of the Revisionist View on the Sun- and Moon-gods in Southern Arabia) where one can find much more evidence, illustrations, sourcing and further refutation of the revisionist critics. The section on Hubal being Jupiter was extracted from Moon-o-theism (volume II, pages 768-774, section: Hubal as Baal). Moon-o-theism shows that beyond a doubt Allah was a war- and moon-god, and both volumes are well worth the read.
(Excerpt) Read more at angelfire.com ...
Ping for later.
btt
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
IIRC, "Angelfire" is a suspect source . . .
I thought Angelfire was sort of a free posting place for people who don't have websites. Not a "source" at all, in the required sense. Depends on the reliability of the individual posters.
Welcome to Free Republic, and good first post! :D
Thanks! I've read dozens of Free Republic articles before and also blogs, but don't usually post much anywhere.
Zul-Qarnain - What is the argument?I have never claimed that Zul-Qarnain *is* the historical Alexander the Great. I don't know why your move to agree with me in this is considered a rebuttal... The argument is then that the Qur'anic story is clearly taken from the legends about Alexander. There are many many details of the Qur'an account which are nearly verbatim to be found in the Alexander legends. Conclusion: Zul-Qarnain clearly is the Alexander the Great of the legend stories. And because the Qur'an presents the material from the legends as if this were history, it shows that Muhammad could not distinguish between legends and history when he incorporated this material in the Qur'an. This is evidence that the Qur'an is not of divine origin.
by Jochen Katz
Oh, but Islam is a religion of peace and humanity. /sarcasm off
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.