Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New James Bond 007 CASINO ROYAL Film Critique

Posted on 11/17/2006 3:01:32 PM PST by Jmouse007

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Jmouse007

The played bond like a man and all business.

I loved it.


21 posted on 11/17/2006 8:09:40 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

The = THEY


22 posted on 11/17/2006 8:10:15 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Good observation, he wasn't just a pretty face who could dodge a billion bullets.


23 posted on 11/17/2006 8:21:39 PM PST by Jmouse007 (Convert, Slavery or Death = "Islam the Religion of Peace tm" "It's time to play Cowboys and Muslims")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

He was human, brave, loyal, in shape and a machine when needed.
He could perhaps last almost 2 minutes with our Jack Bauer.


24 posted on 11/17/2006 8:24:31 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

Just got back from opening night. It's a Bond that brings the franchise back into the "thriller" genre, and Craig is perfect. What a fine actor -- and Martin Campbell is one hell of a director. First-rate in all respects.


25 posted on 11/17/2006 10:07:44 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

I had lunch today in a strip mall next door to a cinema, and the line to buy tickets to the evening showing of Casino Royal was stretched out from the mall into the street.


26 posted on 11/17/2006 10:13:55 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Southack

I read a review today (among several) that said it is just plain one of the best movies of the year, forget being part of a series. In that regard, it's a lot like "Goldfinger," a genre movie that has the impact of a blockbuster.

I forgot to mention in my earlier post how great Judi Dench is, and how marvelous her scenes with Craig are. I suppose the Academy will look at this as just another "James Bond movie," but I'd certainly nominate Judi for Best Supporting Actress for this one. She's a marvel. Holds this big, sprawling thing together, she does.


27 posted on 11/18/2006 12:43:17 AM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007
I heard the guy is a Lefty. Since he will not Shut Up and Act then I will not contribute to his future. I think the guy in real life is a freaking pansy.

Sean Connery will still be my favorite Bond. The guy is a man's man.
28 posted on 11/18/2006 1:32:30 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007
I caught it yesterday afternoon ..... the card game slowed it down a bit .... but it need breaks ..... couldn't get much more action in there

I miss the snappy repartee of Connery and Bronson

.

29 posted on 11/18/2006 3:32:20 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny

Do not mention Chitty Chitty Bang Bang! The Child Catcher has haunted my nightmares for a long long time.


30 posted on 11/18/2006 3:59:20 AM PST by James Ewell Brown Stuart (If you want to have a good time, jine the cavalry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
"I miss the snappy repartee of Connery and Bronson"

Give it time, given the fact that this is like a fresh installment taking Mr. Bond back to his roots/beginnings ala "Batman Begins" there is a possibility that the "snappy repartee" will develop later as the character grows even more proficient in his stock and trade and more detached/ruthless (if that is even possible given how proficient, detached and ruthless he was this time around :o)

Even so, I, along with most people, would rather have a rich, realistic story (for once), which is exactly what we got with CASINO ROYAL; peppered with realistic danger (No panties on the head, or mere threatening words for Mr. Bond… just a simple old bamboo seat chair and knotted rope, OUCH!!!!) and action: in this movie, the bad guys actually looked like they REALLY wanted to kill him as brutally as they could, not just mess up his hair (and he ends up with scars that last more than 10 seconds of screen time as a reminder) than a fantasy plot with Bond dodging a billion bullets without getting a scratch, full of snappy throw away one liners.

31 posted on 11/18/2006 4:18:06 AM PST by Jmouse007 (Convert, Slavery or Death = "Islam the Religion of Peace tm" "It's time to play Cowboys and Muslims")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

I haven't watched a Bond movie in years...but reading this thread got me tempted....


32 posted on 11/18/2006 4:25:26 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Go see it; I guarantee you will not be sorry. They have taken the character and story line back to it's roots. All of the elements that made the original/early Bond films so engaging, enjoyable and watchable are back in spades. This is what Bond used to be like before all of the gimmicks, guffaws and fantasy plot lines got in the way.


33 posted on 11/18/2006 4:55:35 AM PST by Jmouse007 (Convert, Slavery or Death = "Islam the Religion of Peace tm" "It's time to play Cowboys and Muslims")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Poser

Poser,I can tell you for a fact that Daniel Craig is around 5'11 or 6ft as I have a friend who was a runner on Layercake and he is at 5'10 slightly shorter.


34 posted on 11/18/2006 4:56:12 AM PST by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

'I went into the film not wanting to like it because of Craig's gaffs with not knowing how to drive a stick and "hating guns", '

Oh dear I guess new travels slow over the Atlantic.

Those stories were NOT true!.

In fact both the Sun and the Daily Mirror printed retractions at one point.

And Craig DIDNT say he hated guns,he DID say he knows what damage they do and they arent toys....


35 posted on 11/18/2006 4:58:19 AM PST by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

'I heard'...'I think'...

Mate,you need to read a bit more.You seem to be making judgements on things you have heard in passing.

You arent sure whether he is a 'Lefty'.Yet you are decideing you dont like him based on what you think/might have heard he is...maybe...

Firstly,Craig isnt a 'Lefty' in the way you mean it.He seems to be a Labour or Lib Dem voter as far as I can tell(like most British actors) and your average liberal,but he MAY very well be a Tory voter.

Secondly,what ARE you going on about ...'Since he will not Shut Up and Act'...????

Daniel Craig has not made one political statement since becoming Bond.NOT ONE.Either about Britain or America.

He has answered a few questions about guns,which as I have pointed out,did NOT have him say he hated guns,but that he hates people treating them like toys when they are after all an instrument designed to kill...from this he has been touted as some pansy ass Limey fag who hates guns,the NRA and America.

Utter utter utter crap..

'I think the guy in real life is a freaking pansy'

The same Daniel Craig that has had a string of beautiful women.And is a rather notorious womaniser.

The same Daniel Craig that has been praised by the CR stuntmen for demanding he do as many of the stunts as possible.

Oh and I have ALREADY pointed out,those UK tabloid stories about the 'stick' car problems etc.,were all crap.

Mainly from one paper(the Daily Mirror) who didnt want him as Bond.And who by the way,have eaten crow and have just given him and CR rave reviews....


36 posted on 11/18/2006 5:11:52 AM PST by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

The Fleming books were so good, and the films have been so disappointing. Most movie-goers have never read the Bond books, so they don't realize how they are being short-changed.

To date, the best treatment of a Fleming/Bond book was From Russia With Love.

Roger Moore was by far the WORST screen Bond. He treated the character like a Vaudeville act. Then, the original producer of the screen series died, and the productions were turned over to his daughter, who decided to feminize Bond, and make his boss, M, a female.

I'm anxious to see Casino Royale, because it sounds as though there has been a real attempt to return the plot to actually mirror Fleming's book.

As an aside, Sean Connery's primary reason for leaving the role of James Bond was his disgust at the butchering of the Fleming plots with gadgets and gimmicks.


37 posted on 11/18/2006 6:09:11 AM PST by colonel mosby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colonel mosby
How right you are. I read the books before seeing any of the movies. Roger Moore was the opposite of James Bond. When the Bond gadgets started, the similarities between the books and the movies declined.

I thought Timothy Dalton was a better bond than Brosnan or Moore.

James Bond was NOT a metrosexual. (or gay like Moore)
38 posted on 11/18/2006 7:53:19 AM PST by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Waiting for it to come to San Francisco. < :)


39 posted on 11/18/2006 8:52:09 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (The internet: "Do you punch little buttons and things?"--Larry King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

The opening titles are totally cool, very artistic, and a wonder to watch.

Saw the movie last night. I'm "itching" to see it again.


40 posted on 11/18/2006 8:56:14 AM PST by Silly (Still being... Silly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson