[Candor7]

There is NO DNA evidence. There is DNA evidence that supposedly identified 3 of the accused as the perpetrators, which is not of sufficient provenance to have any probative value.

There is circumstantial evidence,that the three were present at the party and one had had a 30 second opportunity to rape and sodomize the complainant.( We all know LaCross players are quick....sarc)The others have contrary evidence to the supposed time line that they were not then present.

However, the prosecution says it has other evidentiary cards to play, and IF Nifong doesn't have that, he is history, unless he can manage to trump up a series of other "fictional" offences to keep the flames of racial hatred burning. I do not buy any of that, and do not cast blame on my fellow black Americans, who have been traduced by a minority of black rascist moonbats, and their political white whores like Nifong.

I know has he not yet interviewed the complainant? Why? He has to decide what story she will need to have scripted.Then he will interview her. He should resign and go to acting school before he's lynched by a unified mob of black AND white folk.

[TommyDale]

There is no real evidence at all. Legal minds all over America agree that this case should have never been filed.

There is no evidence.

[ltc8k6]

"There is DNA evidence that supposedly identified 3 of the accused as the perpetrators, which is not of sufficient provenance to have any probative value."

No, that is totally wrong. There is no DNA evidence that identifies anyone as a perpetrator.

There is no DNA from any player in or on Crystal. There is no DNA from Crystal in the bathroom.

Crystal's boyfriend's DNA. Matt Murchison, was inside her.

[Ken H]

There is DNA evidence that supposedly identified 3 of the accused as the perpetrators...

What are you basing this on?

[Jezebelle]

There isn't even any evidence of a crime having been committed, which is what the entire case is actually about and the reason Liefong won't interview Mangum.