Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Gribbles141
2 posted on
11/08/2006 12:08:16 PM PST by
Fury
To: Gribbles141
3 posted on
11/08/2006 12:08:54 PM PST by
BunnySlippers
(Never Forget)
To: Gribbles141
4 posted on
11/08/2006 12:09:37 PM PST by
TheBigB
(Do you think "Lady in the Water" is in Ted Kennedy's NetFlix queue?)
To: Gribbles141
7 posted on
11/08/2006 12:10:50 PM PST by
RedCell
("...thou shalt kill thine enemy before he killeth you by any means available" - Dick Marcinko)
To: Gribbles141
I sure hope this turns out for AZ and Hayworth. One or two nice surprises would be great right now.
To: Gribbles141
Any idea what the breakdown might be on the remaining ballots?
12 posted on
11/08/2006 12:11:41 PM PST by
Clump
To: Gribbles141
If true, this could conceivably effect the marriage amendment.
13 posted on
11/08/2006 12:11:57 PM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
To: Gribbles141
A miracle here and there would help my mood... LOL
14 posted on
11/08/2006 12:12:18 PM PST by
madison10
(Live your life in such a way that the preacher won't have to lie at your funeral.)
To: Gribbles141
Man I hope so. I have always liked JD. I was shocked when he was reported as a loss. Fingers are crossed but I am still skeptical.
15 posted on
11/08/2006 12:12:18 PM PST by
rtsimon
To: Gribbles141
To: Gribbles141
That's the best news I've heard all day. *crossing my fingers*
19 posted on
11/08/2006 12:13:14 PM PST by
ilovew
("I was born an American; I will live an American; I shall die an American." --Daniel Webster)
To: Gribbles141
Those numbers don't seem right. Too many mail in ballots compared to the total number that each candidate currently has.
To: Gribbles141
Can you give us a link or something, so we don't think this is just BS?
To: Gribbles141
23 posted on
11/08/2006 12:14:52 PM PST by
spectre
(Spectre's wife)
To: Gribbles141
100,000 mail-in ballots, and 136,000 live voting ballots? That's a high percentage of mail-ins!
24 posted on
11/08/2006 12:15:39 PM PST by
Real Cynic No More
(The only thing standing between us and complete victory over the evildoers is POLITICS!)
To: Gribbles141
It would be nice to see the absentees break 60/40 to JD. As you know, the Communist Crook Mitchell has not declared victory.
25 posted on
11/08/2006 12:15:53 PM PST by
gipper81
(Americans have been voting for "free lunch economics" and big government for 20+yrs, at a minimum)
To: Gribbles141
*fingers crossed*
Good luck y'all...
27 posted on
11/08/2006 12:16:11 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be.)
To: Gribbles141
Question: once a candidate concedes, the opponent wins even though the opponent finally gets less number of votes?.
To: Gribbles141
The fact that he didn't concede is good. Contrary to what I think most people belive, conceding has no legal bearing on the outcome (at least in most states). It generally means that the candidate won't contest the outcome and send his legal eagles in.
30 posted on
11/08/2006 12:17:39 PM PST by
CaptRon
(Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
To: Gribbles141
I just got an email from Cathi Herrod about Prop. 107 and she said there are as many as 300-400,000 still NOT COUNTED.
We can hope!!!
35 posted on
11/08/2006 12:19:11 PM PST by
hsmomx3
(Steelers in '07--Go BIG BEN!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson