1 posted on
11/05/2006 11:05:57 AM PST by
narby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: PatrickHenry
2 posted on
11/05/2006 11:06:48 AM PST by
narby
To: narby
Score 17650 for evolution.
To: narby
Therefore siamese twins provide further evidence of...??
4 posted on
11/05/2006 11:08:09 AM PST by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: narby
time for someone to post that "Awe Geez" picture ???
5 posted on
11/05/2006 11:09:04 AM PST by
11th_VA
To: narby

Chickens are descended from dolphins.
6 posted on
11/05/2006 11:10:53 AM PST by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: narby
7 posted on
11/05/2006 11:13:55 AM PST by
ASA Vet
(3.03)
To: narby
How exactly is this evidence? More wishful thinking is more accurate. A baby boy (from China, incidentally) was born with three arms, all functional (so five limbs). So, are humans descended from five-legged/appendaged animals? Can you say pollution?
9 posted on
11/05/2006 11:16:25 AM PST by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( The EU is opposed to Saddam Hussein's death sentence.)
To: narby
So this find of a dolphin with an extra set of fins is supposed to prove that dolphins were once land dwellers .... I wonder what made 'em decide to go native??
11 posted on
11/05/2006 11:22:48 AM PST by
Ken522
To: narby
...evidence that ocean-dwelling mammals once had four legs and lived on land...Or soon will.
So Long and Thanks For All the Fish.
12 posted on
11/05/2006 11:24:56 AM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Mathemeticians are machines that turn coffee into theorems.)
To: narby
Evidence that the Japanese are dumping nuclear waste in the ocean, maybe.
14 posted on
11/05/2006 11:28:39 AM PST by
Tax-chick
("If we have no fear, Pentecost comes again." ~ Bishop William Curlin)
To: narby
Mutation
Will it produce more, most likely not.
Will it live long as such maybe.
Is it proof that believers in evolution will use anything to support macro-evolution including fossils which prove nothing. Undoubtedly yes.
Sprinkle some what if, imagine that, could have, might have, seems to have, dust on it and you have evolution.
15 posted on
11/05/2006 1:52:22 PM PST by
Creationist
(If the earth is old show me your proof. Salvation from the judgment of your sins is free.)
To: narby; Aetius; Alamo-Girl; AndrewC; Asphalt; Aussie Dasher; Baraonda; BereanBrain; betty boop; ...
It's these wild irrational, illogical extrapolations that show people how foolish evolutionism is, and how desperate they have become as their house of cards tumbles down.
18 posted on
11/05/2006 2:21:59 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: narby
Interesting. Are any scientists consdiering the possibility that this is not the past but future look for dolphins?
19 posted on
11/05/2006 2:23:47 PM PST by
skr
(We cannot play innocents abroad in a world that is not innocent.-- Ronald Reagan)
To: narby
22 posted on
11/05/2006 3:17:12 PM PST by
TADSLOS
(Mohammed was the L. Ron Hubbard of his time.)
To: narby
A bottlenose dolphin has been found with an extra set of fins, providing further evidence that ocean-dwelling mammals once had four legs and lived on land, scientists have claimed. Sounds more like someone is grasping at straws here. That's quite a bit of conjecture over could also be called a birth defect.
23 posted on
11/05/2006 3:17:17 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: narby
This is totally ABSURD!
Fossils do NOT indicate that dolphins had four legs or fins.
There is NO evidence to even suggest that dolphins wandered around on the land.
It's just an abnormality. Just like with people - strange things happen.
25 posted on
11/05/2006 3:50:50 PM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: narby
This kinda of thing is EXACTLY what I've been saying about evolution's cult. Evolutionist take a fact and twist it to fit some preconceive conclusion. Nothing wrong with that, it just needs to be made clear that the conclusion is NOT fact.
It's totally ridiculous to conclude as "Fact" something you have not observed. And it's bad science. You can "Believe" a certain outcome, but that's called religion...but evolutionist have no Faith, so they have to end up convoluting facts that's called a Cult.
28 posted on
11/06/2006 4:27:53 AM PST by
sirchtruth
(No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
To: narby
Dolphins did evolve from land mammals, but one deformed animal doesn't prove anything. This article is sensational and unscientific.
To: narby
Can a three-eyed fish be next?

32 posted on
11/06/2006 5:36:13 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: narby
A bottlenose dolphin has been found with an extra set of fins, providing further evidence that ocean-dwelling mammals once had four legs and lived on land, scientists have claimed.
More PROOF!!!! of Evolution!!!!!!
33 posted on
11/06/2006 5:43:38 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson