You're right, he didn't. He knows just enough to be able to cut-and-paste from kooky creationist sites, but not enough to read and understand and determine whether they're valid, or whether they're full of horse manure, much less read and understand the primary scientific literature on the subject and the rebuttals to the creationist nonsense.
I could just as easily respond that you know how to cut and paste evolutionist garbage. You express prejudicial language like, "full of horse manure," and you merely offer inadequate, vague notions because you don't seem to read any more heavily than I do other than your ability to mount antagonizing language and sneering tones...or in essence...pretend you have a monopoly on science and like the world that believed that a flat earth was a scientific fact...attack any contrary idea. You seem to view science more like an ideology.