I could just as easily respond that you know how to cut and paste evolutionist garbage. You express prejudicial language like, "full of horse manure," and you merely offer inadequate, vague notions because you don't seem to read any more heavily than I do other than your ability to mount antagonizing language and sneering tones...or in essence...pretend you have a monopoly on science and like the world that believed that a flat earth was a scientific fact...attack any contrary idea. You seem to view science more like an ideology.
Sure you could, if you wanted to avoid the facts and dishonestly describe well-established science as "garbage". Do you want to do that?
You express prejudicial language like, "full of horse manure,"
That's not "prejudicial language", that's my deeply considered opinion after following this issue very closely for over three decades.
and you merely offer inadequate, vague notions because you don't seem to read any more heavily than I do
Say what? I'm very familiar with the science that's being distorted by the creationists. I've written thousands of detailed debunkings of their twaddle. I've read tens of thousands of primary research articles. Don't tell me I'm not any more competent in this topic than you are or that I don't offer anything more than "vague notions".
other than your ability to mount antagonizing language and sneering tones...or in essence...pretend you have a monopoly on science and like the world that believed that a flat earth was a scientific fact...attack any contrary idea. You seem to view science more like an ideology.
You seem to be frothing at the mouth at me rather than refuting anything I've actually posted.