WND sells tin foil?
whoulda thunk.
Are the Minutemen really affiliated with this website?Are the Minutemen trying to get Democrats elected now?
This guy needs to take his medications urgently.
I know FR etiquette says you should ping any FReeper you mention, but I can't remember Corsi's screen name.
Makes sense of Bush's unwillingness to secure the boarder and excoriate the Minutemen. Especially if you know there isn't going to be a legal border for much longer, that is.
I would assume these are being posted somewhere on a server we can all link to now?
ping for future.
'Corsi said the documentation he received is missing key pieces.
"We received very few actual agreements ..."'
That's because the precursor "agreements" are not law until they are included in a final treaty, voted as "passed" by the US Congress. It's called, "diplomacy" and it's usual. Jeez.
Probably has a lot to do with paving the way (not to pun!) for the International Superhighway, extending from, eventually, South America, all the way to Colorado, all the way to Canada, the Long Link itself an extension of NAFTA, and supposed to be a counterweight to a united Europe. It's a good thing.
Yep, and the moon i made of cream cheese.
Sounds like he's off his meds. again.
Meh....I get emails with multiple cc's all the time and I'm not even involved in government. I can't imagine how carefully you have to cover your a$$ in the public sector.
Since when have libs cared about anything like this? Aren't they always the ones saying we need to stop acting unilaterally? Aren't liberals the cheerleaders for an U.N. world government?
Not thrilling information. Not . . . a lot of things.
The global government is coming. Scripture is clear about that.
Woe to anyone who . . .
And now for the "hypocrisy" category:
http://www.mexiconews.com.mx/21156.html
The Mexican government said Monday it will present the U.N. Human Rights Council with a resolution criticizing a U.S. plan to build hundreds of kilometers (miles) of additional fencing on the border. Mexican Ambassador Luis Alfonso de Alba, president of the 47-member council, said the resolution will denounce the fence for violating human rights and driving undocumented migrants to cross the border in more remote and dangerous areas. The United States is an observer but not a member of the council, which this year replaced the widely discredited U.N. Human Rights Commission. At the council´s first sessions this year, members failed to reach agreement on the most hotly debated issues, such as on human rights violations in Sudan. Last month, the U.S. Senate approved a bill to build 1,100 kilometers (700 miles) of border fencing. U.S. President George W. Bush has said he will sign it into law, despite pleas from the Mexican government for a veto. President Vicente Fox has called the plan "shameful" and compared it to the Berlin Wall. An estimated 11 million Mexicans live in the United States, about half them illegally.
Why don't WE file a complaint with the UN over Mexico's flagrantly anti-gringo immigration laws that lead to the poverty there of which they hypocritically complain? Their laws are detailed here:
http://www.directory.com.mx/immigration
This is NOT tinfoil hat stuff. My brother-in-law works for Energy Department and has been part of a US/Mexico/Canada workgroup for years.
Internationalists are smart enough not to try to get rid of the trappings of national sovereignty. But they know the American people are too distracted taking the kids to soccer practice and watching "Survivor" on their big screen TVs to care what's going on. They're creating a de facto unification and as long as they still sing the National Anthem at sporting events nobody will ever notice.