Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyd
Kim was consistent in her written and oral interview with the police early on.

She was?

She told Hinman in the first interview that the assault was a crock and she was only away from the AV once for less than 5 minutes.

She made neither of those claims in her written statement. She insinuates that from the time she left the bath room until the boys brought the AV to the car, they were separated.

Since we know that Bissey saw them together at about 12:20 we know that her written statement is either a purposeful lie, intentionally misleading or just a boo boo. Any of which make it a deviation from her phone call with Hinman.

I suppose Bissey could be mistaken as well. He also said he saw the AV go back to the house for her shoe alone. Which would have made at least a second seperation that Kim didn't mention in her written statement.

I never said Kim gave a verbatim of the AV's statement. I said she appears to have deviated from her original phone call to Hinman and her written statement in his presence. If you want to see them as one in the same that's you privilege. I choose not to. I guess that's my "problem".

542 posted on 10/14/2006 5:33:32 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies ]


To: darbymcgill

I think Kim has changed her "opinion" regarding the case but not her story. Initially she said it was a "crock", then in an AP interview she said she thought the guys were guilty. But she has never backed up what the accuser said in her police statement. She has never said they were forcibly separated and that she helped Precious get dressed. Apparently she says on 60 Minutes that this is the first she has ever heard of that. At first I thought that was impossible but now I'm starting to believe it. Her eyes really pop out when Bradley reads that to her.

As for Kim's original handwritten police statement, I think that's as close to the truth as you'll ever get with her. I do think she left a few things out though. Most notably, she left out the big argument she had with the players over money. This was heard by Bissey. She also made a big deal out of the fact that Crystal seemed to have lost her money and she went looking for her things. She may have looked but I think she was trying to throw suspicion off herself. I think it's likely that she stole Crystal's money.


564 posted on 10/14/2006 9:47:23 AM PDT by SarahUSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson