[jennyd]

The crock statement came from Kim's interview with Himan.
It's really hard to understand what exactly your problem is.
Kim was consistent in her written and oral interview with the police early on.
Later on, Nifong gave her favorable treatment on her probation violation, and even then neither of the stories she said to the media EVER supported claims by Precious that Kim and Precious were separated at the bathroom door by six different men.

[darbymcgill]

Kim was consistent in her written and oral interview with the police early on.

She was?

She told Hinman in the first interview that the assault was a crock and she was only away from the AV once for less than 5 minutes.

She made neither of those claims in her written statement. She insinuates that from the time she left the bath room until the boys brought the AV to the car, they were separated.

Since we know that Bissey saw them together at about 12:20 we know that her written statement is either a purposeful lie, intentionally misleading or just a boo boo. Any of which make it a deviation from her phone call with Hinman.

I suppose Bissey could be mistaken as well. He also said he saw the AV go back to the house for her shoe alone. Which would have made at least a second seperation that Kim didn't mention in her written statement.

I never said Kim gave a verbatim of the AV's statement. I said she appears to have deviated from her original phone call to Hinman and her written statement in his presence. If you want to see them as one in the same that's you privilege. I choose not to. I guess that's my "problem".