I don't appreciate my parody being called a lie... From you're statement above as well as you not knowing my earlier post was parody you obviously don't know as much about this case as I thought.
There was not a "crock" statement in Kim's written document, neither was there a 5 minutes statement. But I thought you would have known that... Linwood...
I don't know if you're delusional and think I'm Linwood, or drunk or are just a vicious person who enjoys playing games, but your methods of discussing this case are psychopathic, in my opinion, and this is not the first time you have done this. Until this past week, I was mostly gone from this forum for almost a month. Others will have to just understand that I (erringly) placed trust in your representations under the assumption that it was information that came to light during my absence from this forum. I had no idea you were fabricating blatant lies.
By the way, it doesn't matter if she wrote a statement or made statements over the phone to one of the cops - it's still a witness statement and her account, with no known changes of any significance that you are honestly aware of - just those you make up. So the answer to my original question as to whether Kim gave conflicting stories as to what happened in the house is "No", but you just didn't want to admit that, once again, you are wrong. Maybe you just need to learn to RTFQ (read the f'ng question) so you don't feel compelled to make a lying jackass out of yourself again in order to save face, since appearing to be right is more important to you than actually being right.
Anyway, shame on you.