Fabulous.
Ping.
Fixed it.
L
Why even bother with cash anymore? Some punk cop decides he want to confiscate your cash, there's nothing you can do about it. No drugs? No problem!
Why would you buy a house for cash? Why not write a check?
I think it was Dateline that showed an old black man that was traveling, that lost a little over $800.00 because the law thought it was too much cash for a guy like him to have.
This country is beginning to resemble a banana republic.
I've recently read another ,similar post on here about this. Its disturbing that your money can be confiscated on a dogs opinion. Even if these guys are suspicious,taking thier money and not charging them with anything? Could it be a corrupt police department?
And the dog was able to testify as to the strength of this odor exactly how? Stupid journalists, evil law, injustice abounds.
Federal Appeals Court: Driving With Money is a CrimeEighth Circuit Appeals Court ruling says police may seize cash from motorists even in the absence of any evidence that a crime has been committed.
A federal appeals court ruled yesterday that if a motorist is carrying large sums of money, it is automatically subject to confiscation. In the case entitled, "United States of America v. $124,700 in U.S. Currency," the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit took that amount of cash away from Emiliano Gomez Gonzolez, a man with a "lack of significant criminal history" neither accused nor convicted of any crime.
On May 28, 2003, a Nebraska state trooper signaled Gonzolez to pull over his rented Ford Taurus on Interstate 80. The trooper intended to issue a speeding ticket, but noticed the Gonzolez's name was not on the rental contract. The trooper then proceeded to question Gonzolez -- who did not speak English well -- and search the car. The trooper found a cooler containing $124,700 in cash, which he confiscated. A trained drug sniffing dog barked at the rental car and the cash. For the police, this was all the evidence needed to establish a drug crime that allows the force to keep the seized money.
Associates of Gonzolez testified in court that they had pooled their life savings to purchase a refrigerated truck to start a produce business....Source:
US v. $124,700 (US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 8/19/2006)
They stole those guys money pure and simple.
Why isn't this theft?
"No drugs were found, and the two men weren't charged with a crime, but officers did keep the money,...."
I can't wait to see the FR support for such an abuse of individual liberty.
And after that, they were going to fly from Atlanta to Minneapolis then drive to Phoenix to buy another house.
Uh-huh.
The dog hit on the cocaine residue on the money.
The seizure was illegal.
So that's where Jefferson D-LA hides his money now.
No drugs were found, and the two men weren't charged with a crime, but officers did keep the money.
This is sometimes called grand theft and at other times armed robbery.
Because the "officers" had guns, I'd say this was armed robbery.
Davidson County, NC is notorious for using I-85 as a hunting ground for finding drugs and "drug" money. I was a lot worse under Sheriff Hege, but he's toast now. At times there is a flying squadron of 3 or 4 unmarked sheriff's vehicles prowling and profiling cars with out-of-state plates. There's been many times when I've passed through there and seen entire families sitting on guard rail while a sheriff's deputy empties the contents of their car onto the shoulder of the highway. (and he's not changing the tire either)
ping