Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dog: The Family Speaks (Anyone see it? Discuss)
09/20/2006 | dg

Posted on 09/20/2006 6:29:44 AM PDT by HOTTIEBOY

I think it is pretty rotten the way the situation was handled, especially since Andrew Luster was in Mexico at the time and was probably drugging and raping citizens there. I have never been one to believe conspiracies, but there has got to be more to this.

I think he should be commended instead of arrested. Leland said it best when he said something like, "We didn't take a Mexican citizen, we can and got an American rapists and brought him back to face justice."


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: dog; dogthebountyhunter; duanechapman; mexico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: CharlesWayneCT

Ok no point taken. Dog should have appeared for his hearing in Mexico. He didn't and will have to face his charge there. But in Mexico what he was charged with was( according to that show) a misdemeanor. I don't know if that is correct. If Luster had been raping women in Mexico why would the Mexicans bother to charge him as he is going to spend a long time in jail here in the USA. I don't think a misdemeanor should be an extraditable crime to Mexico. But that of course is just my opinion. I think there are more people who have committed worse crimes then the Chapmans to extradite.


21 posted on 09/20/2006 11:35:14 AM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Heres some links I went to make sure I wasn't just getting my info from a bail jumper on TV.

http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/sexual_assault/andrew_luster/14.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Luster In this one it says there was GHB in his room which is also called the date rape drug. So why did he have it?


22 posted on 09/20/2006 11:50:59 AM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Charles, I have great respect for anyone who provides facts in a discussion as you have. After reading your post and doing some further research, I think some of my perceptions of this issue were incorrect.

Having known for years of the deep corruption at every level of the Mexican judicial system, and watching the Mexican government openly and daily flout our immigration laws, I have a low opinion of their government in general. (And it's difficult emotionally to always take the high road when our enemies profit, often at our expense, by taking the low one. But I realize I shouldn't let that emotion interfere with my thinking.)

However, I'm willing to be proven wrong about my expectation of injustice where the Chapmans are concerned. And I certainly want to believe what you say about them being safe in a Mexican prison should it come to that. If their fame will make that happen, then good. I'll await developments with interest.

By the way, in my research today I read that an NBC affiliate has reported that the decision about whether to extradite the Chapmans to Mexico will be made by Condoleezza Rice. It was just a one-sentence statement, and the affiliate wasn't identified, so I don't know how accurate it is.

And for the record, I'm not among the posters who've accused you of a pro-Luster bias. (I believe you know that.)

23 posted on 09/20/2006 12:29:24 PM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HOTTIEBOY

I saw it. Very informative. What's boggling me right now is the fact that Dog and his crew met with local Mexican authorities and they helped hin get Luster. After aiding them, they arrested him. It just doesn't make much sense.


24 posted on 09/20/2006 12:36:39 PM PDT by MeliJara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

I agree with you. 87 counts in America that were reported. I wonder how many were not reported. I'm sure he has done the same thing in Mexico, but nobody talks about it because the women don't even know what happened.


25 posted on 09/20/2006 12:41:32 PM PDT by MeliJara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

You make a good point about extraditing on a misdemeanor. According to the Extradition treaty we have with Mexico, the act must be a crime in both countries and punishable for more than 1 year in jail. Either party has the option to say "No, we won't extradite" if they choose to do so.


26 posted on 09/20/2006 12:45:25 PM PDT by MeliJara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MeliJara

What's boggling me right now is the fact that Dog and his crew met with local Mexican authorities and they helped hin get Luster. After aiding them, they arrested him. It just doesn't make much sense.

I was thinking the very same thing. From what my mother in law who winters in Mexico says its a very corrupt system and had Dog paid them off he wouldn't have been charged. But who knows. I am just glad Luster was caught and brought back here to do his time. What he did was disgusting and he needs to be in jail. He must be a very sick pervert to drug, rape and video tape those poor women.


27 posted on 09/20/2006 1:07:33 PM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

Can we send Paris Hilton over instead of Dog???

That's "hot".


28 posted on 09/20/2006 2:16:45 PM PDT by JaiJai2005 (yeah okay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

Wastin away again in Margaritaville....
lookin for my show's new plot.

Some people say that there's a Dog to blame,

but I know...

It's Fox's damn fault.


29 posted on 09/20/2006 2:20:05 PM PDT by JaiJai2005 (yeah okay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JaiJai2005

Let Mexico have Cindy Sheehan too. I'm sure we could find a bunch of other people to send too. lol


30 posted on 09/20/2006 2:28:32 PM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

I think you are right about who makes the decision. I had thought it was a court, but the court is involved only regarding whether the warrant is servable, not the final decision, and they already went to that court.

So we could lobby the state department to stop the extradition, and I think anybody who is upset with this SHOULD call the state department -- I'd be happy if he WASN'T extradited, I just think we need to follow procedure.

I am only "hopeful" that nothing will happen to him. I do realise Mexico is not exactly a first-class country, and it bothers me that in defending the rule of law I'm also having to live with defending Mexico, which I don't want to do.

For every Chapman, I bet there are a dozen others who go through this process and AREN'T celebrities and who knows what happens to them.


31 posted on 09/20/2006 2:50:17 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

Thanks for the links. The first one indicates he had a book with his victim's names, which I do not dispute but isn't itself indicative of crimes IN mexico.

The "mexican pickup lines" could be nothing more than that he wanted to still sleep with women. It doesn't mean he was raping them.

The Wikipedia entry about finding GHB in his hotel is a more serious thing. But I couldn't find any link to a news story that corroberated that charge, so I discounted it. I'm not saying it isn't true, just that I can't find a source for it (Wikipedia of course is not a source for anything).

I'm sorry that my previous post sounded accusatory or demeaning. It wasn't my intent, I should be more careful in my choice of words.


32 posted on 09/20/2006 2:58:39 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

No problem. I think Dog as a bail bonds man and bounty hunter he should have showed up for his Mexican hearing. It has also crossed my mind this could be a publicity stunt of some kind. I hope not but I don't trust tv. Just so you know I don't really watch that show . lol


33 posted on 09/20/2006 3:32:46 PM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit
You commend an individual that knowingly and willingly violates the laws of another country? Do you welcome those foreigners that knowingly and willingly violate US law? What Chapman did was just plain ol' fashion stupid. "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime"

My, my, aren't we righteous. You can't see a set-up right in front of your face?

Chapman said a Mexican policeman helped him with the collar. If bounty hunting is illegal in Mexico, the policeman should have told him, and the policeman should also be facing charges.

Let's hope you never have a misunderstanding with a police officer and try to explain yourself and end up "resisting arrest." It's a slippery slope that can happen to anyone.

34 posted on 09/20/2006 4:34:25 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
THere is NO evidence Luster was commiting ANY crimes in mexico, much less "raping women".

Are you out of your mind?

35 posted on 09/20/2006 4:37:58 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
Damn, you statement that this was a setup is just down-right funny. How tight is your foil wrapped? Be sure the bright side faces outward!!!

From 6 Aug AP..."The bounty hunter who captured convicted rapist Andrew Luster in Mexico won't receive any of the $1 million bail the fugitive Max Factor heir forfeited when he vanished during his trial, a judge ruled. Bounty hunter Duane "Dog" Chapman was not entitled to any share of the money because he was acting on his own and not as a legally authorized bail recovery agent when he snatched Luster off a street in Puerto Vallarta on June 18, Superior Court Judge Edward Brodie ruled Tuesday.". It further states..."Chapman, his son and brother were charged by Mexican authorities with illegally capturing Luster. The three, who were arrested with the fugitive after passers-by reported a scuffle, returned to the United States after posting bail of their own." Reading further ""He went to Mexico and failed to comply with the law. I cannot condone vigilante justice," Brodie said of Chapman. The law requires that bounty hunters have a formal agreement with the bail bond agent or law enforcement, have a clean criminal record and follow local laws when they search for felons. Bounty hunting is considered a crime in Mexico."

Chapman went to Mexico for two reasons...Money and publicity. He got instead the publicity and arrested then proceeded to jump bail. The only real ending to this would have been another bounty hunter making the collar of Chapman and sons and televising the video...guess you could have called the show "Dog Catcher".

36 posted on 09/20/2006 5:25:04 PM PDT by politicalwit (Freedom doesn't mean a Free Pass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

Dog didn't go to the hearing because he got legal advise telling him to leave the country and that he could not, by law, be extradicted on this misdemeaner charge. I think when he goes to the extradiction hearing, the courts will see this as unconstitutional and deny the extradition. (I hope so).


37 posted on 09/21/2006 8:28:59 AM PDT by MeliJara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812
That seems to be a new claim, got any source?

Back in 2003 it was reported that they grabbed Luster when he was eating tacos, and the vendor thought that it was a kidnapping so he called the police. The cops caught up with them when they were in their way to the airport.

"I didn't know if it was a kidnapping or a movie," said Alberto Franco, 26, who was working at the gas station across the street.

Taco stand worker Giovanni Balbuena said the bounty hunters threatened Luster with tear gas, wrestled what appeared to be handcuffs on him and drove away in two cars. Franco said taxi drivers notified local police.

Police caught up with the fleeing cars about 2½ miles northwest of town and arrested the lot, according to Zavala.

here

They never claimed that they met with mexican police before attempting to catch Luster, indeed, his defense before the judge in Mexico was that "we came here as tourists (with two cameramen, mind you) and then we saw Luster and we took our chance", so if they said that in the show, that means they changed their version again.

38 posted on 09/21/2006 9:02:41 AM PDT by waiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: waiver
They never claimed that they met with mexican police before attempting to catch Luster, indeed, his defense before the judge in Mexico was that "we came here as tourists (with two cameramen, mind you) and then we saw Luster and we took our chance", so if they said that in the show, that means they changed their version again.

If you watched the A&E special, you wouldv'e seen from the footage of the capture, the Policia did work with dog.

39 posted on 09/21/2006 9:45:33 AM PDT by MeliJara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: waiver

I watched the A&E show, heard Rita Crosby talk , and tried to find as many links as I could before my PTO meeting. I am not sure what the whole REAL story is. Just as I don't know if some of this is just for his show. But in my opinion I don't think the Chapmans should be extradited, most people that I've heard talk abouut it feel the same. I think its wonderful Luster was caught and now in prison. I am listening to a replay of the show as I type this and it says the Mexican police found video tapes , a notebook of names he wanted to get revenge on and date rape drugs. Which claim are you referring to by the way?


40 posted on 09/21/2006 12:19:22 PM PDT by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson