Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Sexy substitute' gets no jail time
WorldNetDaily ^ | September 19, 2006

Posted on 09/19/2006 10:17:57 AM PDT by Sopater

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com


Cameo Patch

A female high-school substitute teacher in Utah will serve no time behind bars for performing oral sex on a 17-year-old male student, despite comments from the judge that a man would have likely gone to prison.

"If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, I would be inclined to order some incarceration," noted 3rd District Judge Mark Kouris during sentencing yesterday for Cameo Patch.

Patch was a fill-in instructor at Tooele High School, and was arrested after an informant disclosed her alleged relationship with the boy.

She was put on probation for 36 months, and ordered to obtain a psycho-sexual evaluation, as well as pay a $2,000 fine.

"The only thing I can say is that I understand the mistake that I made," Patch told the judge, according to the Salt Lake Tribune. "It opened my eyes to the life I want to live for myself and my [three] kids. I'll never wind up in this situation again."

She and her husband divorced last month.

Patch and the boy reportedly met in the classroom, but engaged in the alleged wrongdoing off campus after school. All indications are the sexual activity was consensual.

According to the police report, "... [Patch] and the juvenile met in a local restaurant, exchanged phone numbers, and arranged to meet to talk later in the evening. During the course of the meeting between the two, sexual activity between [Patch] and the juvenile occurred."

The informant stated Patch "performed oral sex" on the student, but did not engage in sexual intercourse.

Defense attorney Jon Williams said the boy had "created the environment and invited..."

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: freepocrisy; moralabsolutes; naughtyteacherlist; schools
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last
To: DaveyB

Yes you can, I share that dream too.
Imagine no liberal teachings...we might produce another greatest generation...just when we need it too.


141 posted on 09/19/2006 1:33:54 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Weeeeelllll...innocent for sure, since he was 17, but she's already a divorced mom-of-three at 29?! And now she's lost her livelihood. Sad. Guess it's craigslist for her.

(J/K)

142 posted on 09/19/2006 1:37:16 PM PDT by AnnaZ (I think so, Brain, but if we give peas a chance, won't the lima beans feel left out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701

"..."If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, I would be inclined to order some incarceration,"..."

"But since you're a 29 year old hottie, you get a pass."


And meet me in my office during our 10 minute break!


143 posted on 09/19/2006 1:40:18 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of an American Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DaveyB
All of you guys have forgotten what it was like to be 17. Or was it just my libido that was out of control?

I think I'll go home and see what the wife is doing.

144 posted on 09/19/2006 1:40:19 PM PDT by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: mlbford2

"She's hot and the guy was 17 for gawd sakes. When I was 17 I was FAR from a virgin. Plus did I mention she is hot?"

So we should give a pass to teachers who engage in this activity when they meet a certain criteria. Huh?


145 posted on 09/19/2006 1:41:53 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of an American Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DaveyB

Found another - and I work in public education. Happily married 26 years and faithful.


146 posted on 09/19/2006 1:48:33 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of an American Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: najida
I think the whole 'female virgin' thing is simply men don't want competition, or worse, comparisons made between them and those who preceeded them...

Oh that's what God was thinking! Who Knew!

147 posted on 09/19/2006 1:56:10 PM PDT by DaveyB (Ignorance is part of the human condition - atheism makes it permanent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: DaveyB

I don't think she thinks that way myself :)


148 posted on 09/19/2006 1:57:59 PM PDT by najida (The internet is for kids grown up-- Where else could you have 10,000 imaginary friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: mlbford2; pissant; najida; wagglebee; JamesP81; Sopater; lakeman; Dark Skies
I was already in the Marine corps at seventeen (I graduated young). I was not, however ready to be a parent. But ,being already out on my own, I was closer than this kid. The law, however, is written to do the most good for the most people.

I work for my Father in law in a small family business. We have a moderate turn over, and we get a steady stream of people who go to work and then quit when we start garnishing their wages. Garnishing them for child support. A lot of them are men who conceived children as teenagers while still in high school. The victims in these cases are the children, mlbford2.

These children need and deserve parents who care for them. The young fathers who saddled themselves under a burden they could not yet bear while in their youth - Still owe emotional and fiscal care to their children. Saddled with financial burdens they can not meet, often they fail to mature as they otherwise might have. Their child's needs are the greatest. these men do not deserve to have that burden lifted, because their children deserve to be supported by them. It is these guy's responsibility, not that of some nebulous "society". The child needs the support of a father and a mother.

When you have immature people engaging in sex this happens. In cases where an adult woman is involved, She bears an adult's responsibility for risking the infliction of this state of affairs both on the young male and on any progeny they might have engendered.

The claim that this was "consensual" is ludicrous. Most hormonally charged teens do not have the willpower to resist a sexually attractive adult, particularly when you consider the natural effects of pheromones. Without a significant ability to deny consent then consent itself has no meaning.

Then there are the other parties who are involved. This is not necessarily between two people. Did any potential child consent to be raised without TWO parents? What about this woman's children? Looks like they lost having two parents already. "Victimless crime" indeed. In cases where the young males involved never become able to take care of children that result from these liaisons what happens to them, mlbford2? Do they starve? Do all these women marry some great superdad-type guy? Are these predominately wealthy women with a ton of money?

That last paragraph was rhetorical. The grand parents usually try to step in, and mlbford2, They didn't consent when nobody else steps up to the plate, the taxpayer picks up the tab (albeit in a fumbling, inadequate way) And believe me, I'm not consenting.

149 posted on 09/19/2006 2:01:32 PM PDT by MrEdd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
The claim that this was "consensual" is ludicrous. Most hormonally charged teens do not have the willpower to resist a sexually attractive adult, particularly when you consider the natural effects of pheromones.

This is absolutely wrong. At 17, you need to be responsible for yourself, period. 17-year olds have free will just like everyone else; and just like everyone else, they have to live with the consequences of the things they do. I don't care how overpowering the drive is, nobody made this 17 year old sleep with this 29-year old. If there are consequences of his actions, he must bear them and at 17 he ought to know that. And if he doesn't, then he's going to learn. The hard way.
150 posted on 09/19/2006 2:27:32 PM PDT by JamesP81 (The answer always lies with more freedom; not less)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
The age of majority is 18. On purpose. Society has recognized that most people are not responsible until that age. You can try to pick 17 or 16 or even twelve if you want to - but that doesn't make it so. Some people are mature at that age.

In my previous post I made it clear that I believe he has certain responsibilities that can not be abrogated. I also believe that the woman should JUSTLY have certain responsibilities - including a lot of hard time in a prison - for her action. In no way did I claim that there were not responsibilities on both sides. He was a minor - a status which indicates that he is still under a certain level of protection by society, do to the incomplete state of his maturation

151 posted on 09/19/2006 2:54:25 PM PDT by MrEdd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

Comment #152 Removed by Moderator

To: MrEdd
The age of majority is 18.

Keep in mind that in a great many states, his being under 18 wouldn't have presented a legal issue. It's the fact that she's his teacher that presents the legal issue.
153 posted on 09/19/2006 4:53:25 PM PDT by JamesP81 (The answer always lies with more freedom; not less)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Well he is an idiot but at least he is honest....What definition of "sexy" are they using for this dog?
154 posted on 09/19/2006 5:18:26 PM PDT by skaterboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Take it easy Mr.Edd, I was just ribbing ya. I don't think its right for any teacher to be giving hummers to their students. I was just jumping on the 'hot teacher fun waggon'. lol


155 posted on 09/19/2006 6:36:26 PM PDT by mlbford2 (I love my Semis, but for me they are for the range. My life is protected by my S&W revolver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Why don't the courts just come on out and officially declare that there are a different set of laws for women.

Why not? There's a different standard of behavior for both men and women.

156 posted on 09/19/2006 6:42:10 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
"If this was a 29-year-old male and a 17-year-old female, I would be inclined to order some incarceration," noted 3rd District Judge Mark Kouris during sentencing yesterday for Cameo Patch.

Wisdom from the bench! Kudos!

157 posted on 09/19/2006 7:27:58 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
What a moron that judge is. The penalty should be the same, regardless of the gender of the teacher.

I disagree. Our culture places a higher value on protecting the sexuality of females than it does protecting the sexuality of males. She is an attractive woman in her late 20s and she got sexual with a 17 year old high school male. It's absurd to think that he was damaged in some way.

It's a tender memory for him. Very clear to me.

158 posted on 09/19/2006 7:41:09 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese
No, its a different set of laws for ATTRACTIVE women.

That's because doing sex things with young, attractive women is pleasurable, while doing sex things with holder hags is much less desirable.

159 posted on 09/19/2006 7:42:23 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Who cares if she's "hot."

I do. Sex things with attractive, willing young women is to be encouraged. Sex things with ugly, willing old women is to be discouraged. It's an immutable law of the universe, at least at my townhouse.

160 posted on 09/19/2006 7:44:30 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson