Posted on 09/18/2006 7:33:33 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
Animal bordellos draw Norwegians Denmark's animal bordellos reportedly draw Norwegian clients, but both countries have loopholes that make such establishments legal. Here a Danish animal owner offers his horse to a Danish journalist claiming to be interested in animal sex.
Related stories: Former cop busted in pig pen - Neither Denmark nor Norway has a prohibition on sex with animals, as long as the animals do not suffer.
On the Internet Danish animal owners advertise openly that they offer sex with animals, without intervention from police or other authorities, Danish newspaper 24timer reports.
In correspondence with the animal owners, the newspaper was told that the animals involved have many years of experience and that the animals themselves wanted sex. The cost to the client varied from DKK 500-1,000 (USD 85-170).
(Excerpt) Read more at aftenposten.no ...
Dunno, butt the koran specifically forbids you from eating a goat you've had relations with...
"Yeah, remarkable bird, the Norwegian Blue, isn't it, eh? Beautiful plumage!"
This is sick. Can't you get diseases from animals? I hope the poor creatures can bite their rapists and kick them. This is just disgusting. What kind of a person wants to have sex with an animal?
Ask the imam?
Two Norwegians go to an animal bordello that featured ponies.
They both pick a pony out of the herd and go to separate stalls for an hour of unbridled pleasure.
One hour later, they both emerge from their stalls, one Norwegian obviously satisfied, the other downcast.
The satisfied Norwegian asked his friend what the matter was.
The downcast Norwegian said that he couldn't achieve the necessary arousal to reach fulfillment.
The satisfied Norwegian said, "Which pony did you have?"
The downcast Norwegian pointed to a little chestnut pony standing off by itself.
The satisfied Norwegian walked over to the pony, grabbed it by the ears, stared hard into it's face and said, "It's no wonder! You had the ugliest one in the herd!"
Yes.
What does it say?
The Manu Samhita says execute both of them.
This is way beyond sick ****.
wagglebee, I've been very busy lately but might be able to do a bit'o'pinging in a week or two.
This is rank and I hate it. It's a perfect example where things go when absolute moral standards are rejected.
What's your viewpoint about this?
BTW, I'm a vegetarian and have been for almost 37 years.
Bestiality is way worse than people like me who want to see the abhorrent crime punished.
And I don't want them jailed, I want them publicly caned.
According to Moses, it's a stoning offense, though I don't know the reference offhand.
There ya go, -- they still use public caning in the middle east.
Never watched the show but I am concerned about all the beastophobic comments here and the inherent insensitivity to those that are different. Sarc implied.
The Will and Trigger show is in our future if liberal tolerance is the rule. What is the libertarian take on this issue?
Freepmail DBeers, wagglebee, little jeremiah or scripter to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
More disgusting behavior that the left would like us to view as a "normal choice" that we shouldn't judge.
Ya but the old testament also says you should kill your kid if he talks back and does not honor his parents. And the last I heard we had sorta abandoned that custom.
Leviticus 18:23
23 " 'Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion.
Among others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.