[Alberta's Child]

Wanting to read and even caring about this crap is no different that the voyeurs who wanted to know every detail of BJ Clinton's trysts with Monica. The intererst in the details are as sick as the narcissists who want to "tell all" about themselves.

I suspect most of us have no interest in the details themselves. The fact that this dysfunctional, f#cked-up freak -- who was once the fair-haired boy in New Jersey Democratic circles -- feels a need to make them public is a huge story unto itself.

[dfwgator]

It's all about taking people's attention away from the corruption while he was governor. And people are taking the bait by focusing on his sexual exploits.

[Victoria Delsoul]

I suspect most of us have no interest in the details themselves. The fact that this dysfunctional, f#cked-up freak -- who was once the fair-haired boy in New Jersey Democratic circles -- feels a need to make them public is a huge story unto itself.

I sometimes wonder why some people have the need to make public their private and lurid affairs, and I've come to the conclusion that narcissistic and disturbed individuals enjoy shocking people – a kind of mental masturbation for their self-gratification and self-indulgences. The need to express their sexual exploits to thousands or millions of people isn't a sign of honesty, but a sign of deeply disturbed individuals.

The question here is, why is the paper publishing these details? Is it a subtle effort to weaken the moral fiber of society and conscientize the public on changing their perspective regarding their view of homosexuals? After all, McGreevey is selling his book.

However, the article emphasis is on McGreevey's sexual prowess, instead of his lack of support for his wife Dina when she was in the hospital giving birth to their daughter while McGreevey was having sex with Cipel.

If he was a Republican, the writing would've been different.