Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
I suspect most of us have no interest in the details themselves. The fact that this dysfunctional, f#cked-up freak -- who was once the fair-haired boy in New Jersey Democratic circles -- feels a need to make them public is a huge story unto itself.

I sometimes wonder why some people have the need to make public their private and lurid affairs, and I've come to the conclusion that narcissistic and disturbed individuals enjoy shocking people – a kind of mental masturbation for their self-gratification and self-indulgences. The need to express their sexual exploits to thousands or millions of people isn't a sign of honesty, but a sign of deeply disturbed individuals.

The question here is, why is the paper publishing these details? Is it a subtle effort to weaken the moral fiber of society and conscientize the public on changing their perspective regarding their view of homosexuals? After all, McGreevey is selling his book.

However, the article emphasis is on McGreevey's sexual prowess, instead of his lack of support for his wife Dina when she was in the hospital giving birth to their daughter while McGreevey was having sex with Cipel.

If he was a Republican, the writing would've been different.

127 posted on 09/15/2006 7:54:25 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Victoria Delsoul

Ironically, McGreevey's screwed-up, pathological behavior is likely to turn people off in a way that his corruption never would.


128 posted on 09/15/2006 8:38:14 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson