Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Diana Wanted to Become America's First Lady: Friendly w/Politcially Connected Billionaire
ABC News ^ | 9/12.06 | Kate Snow

Posted on 09/12/2006 12:19:42 PM PDT by gopwinsin04

Diana Wanted to Become America's First Lady

Paul Burrell with Princess Diana. (ABC News)

By KATE SNOW

NEW YORK, Sept. 12, 2006 — In his new blockbuster book, "The Way We Were," Paul Burrell says that Princess Diana had ambitions to become the first lady of the United States.

"She knew a billionaire in America, and she suggested to him that if they were together. … His yearning to run in politics could lead to the White House, that one day she could be the first lady and she'd visit Britain on a state visit," Diana's former butler and confidant said to "Good Morning America's" Kate Snow in an exclusive interview.

Burrell said that in the mid-1990s Diana had dreamed of following in the footsteps of stylish first ladies.

"She's been a huge fan of Jackie Onassis for years, and a huge admirer, too, of Nancy Reagan and Hillary Clinton. But Jackie Onassis had the edge. And she fantasized about redecorating the White House," Burrell said.

"It wasn't a fantasy. It could have been a reality. It really could. They would have been a golden couple."

While the mystery man in New York had political connections, he was not the love of Princess Diana's life.

Neither was Prince Charles or Dodi Al Fayed, Burrell said, who dismisses claims that Diana was engaged to Fayed when they died in a Paris car crash.

"She was not going to marry Dodi Al Fayed, because there was someone else in her life. She had a soul mate, and she'd fallen in love with someone else," he told Snow.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Society
KEYWORDS: golddigger; nazilarva; poordiana; thenuttyprincess
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-244 next last
To: brownsfan

She was a RL fairy tale...

She was like us in so many ways--- shy, fighting her imaginary weight problems, in love with a man that didn't love her etc.... And yeah, she had her own demons in her psyche to fight. But we never saw her as a bad person...just normal if anything.

And we watched her grow up, fight the paparrazzi, raise two beautiful sons, wear gorgeous clothes etc...And still feel vunerable and unloved... A kindred spirit for many in the world.


61 posted on 09/12/2006 12:37:58 PM PDT by najida (The internet is for kids grown up-- Where else could you have 10,000 imaginary friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

I never fell for the Cinderella/Prince Charming fairy tale, but I always admired her fashion sense. Women admired her classic style. I also think she had "it" or innate charisma. She was a fascinating person to observe, and by many accounts, if you stayed on her good side, she was charming.

She was still a neurotic, immature woman who was on a trashy path with a trashy playboy when she died.


62 posted on 09/12/2006 12:38:08 PM PDT by Cecily (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sandbar

Hmmm, besides her husband, wasn't she committing adultery with another man, who was much more a cad than her husband?


63 posted on 09/12/2006 12:38:41 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

"Reasonably attractive" means she wouldn't have had to beg me. ("Rich" means she wouldn't have looked twice at me.)

However, I in no way found her breathtakingly beautiful, or particularly smart for that matter. I have found all of the stories about her from the beginning to be tedious.

(I have no interest in that jug-eared doofus that she married or any of the other "Royals" eithr for that matter.)


64 posted on 09/12/2006 12:38:53 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Bingo! That was my guess - John-John. But I have one other in reserve.


65 posted on 09/12/2006 12:39:06 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
Dirty Diana!

66 posted on 09/12/2006 12:39:09 PM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
What is the fascination with Diana?

Personally I think several things contribute to it. She was beautful, feminine, sweet-natured, glamorous, married to English royalty (Americans do love royalty as long as it's not in our own country), a loving mother to two handsome little princes, and a genuinely nice person. Later I think there was also lots of sympathy for her unhappiness in her marriage.

67 posted on 09/12/2006 12:39:19 PM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I don't believe she was a golddigger. She was a nursery school helper when she began dating Charles, not exactly the golddigging type of job. But she actually fell in the love with the lug, was born in the right set and was the virgin he needed. Once in the marriage, she did the ugly duckling routine to a man who would never love her, and being extremely insecure, began to look for ways to find fulfillment, satisfaction and love. With her looks, she had many, many paths open to her. She looked high because she could and she dreamed. I believe that the root of her dreams was being loved, respected and finally secure.


68 posted on 09/12/2006 12:40:49 PM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Did Anna Nicole finally ever get that old coot's $$?


69 posted on 09/12/2006 12:41:00 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Bubba would have obliged.


70 posted on 09/12/2006 12:41:20 PM PDT by Buck W. (If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Well there is a connection...

According to Wikipedia, they were both, supposedly, decended from the same Henry Spencer who died in 1478. But if you got fifty Englishmen into a subway car, you could probably find two or three who could make the same claim. Once you go back 500 years, family lines get awfully woven together.

In any case, George Washington's merit was not defined by the fact that he was a distant relation to some Brit who managed to scramble to the top of the pile 300 years before, and Princess Diana's merit was not defined by anything at all, as far as I can tell.

71 posted on 09/12/2006 12:41:21 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TXBubba

>>>I remember getting up in the middle of the night to watch the wedding. It was Cinderella come to life. And until one grows up and realizes what is reality and fantasy you tend to hang on to the fantasy part. The Prince turning into the frog woke most of us up pretty early.>>>

I watched it too and got the picture book for Christmas. She was our "Cinderella" and our love never stopped, even after we grew up and realized how miserable "Cinderella" was. Then it turned into "poor Cindarelly". At least for me.


72 posted on 09/12/2006 12:42:35 PM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
She was nothing more than the same over-hyped jack@sses that dominate our electronic and print media these days.

Sort of like Paris Hilton without the television show . . . or Tupac Shakur without the bullet holes.

Or something like that.

73 posted on 09/12/2006 12:43:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Apparently you have no little girls in your immediate family, or you would know that Disney has struck a gold mine by wrapping all of their female cartoon characters (Cinderella, Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, Ariel, Pocohontas, Jasmine, and Belle) into a "Princess" brand, in which they stamp various and sundry pics of said characters onto pink sheets, pillows, purses, t-shirts, etc. My youngest granddaughter has been responsible for a large chunk of the Disney profit over the last few years.

Whoever thought of that marketing technique for Disney should get a HUGE bonus.

74 posted on 09/12/2006 12:44:34 PM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
My thoughts exactly. As the article states (and I remember reading way back when) Princess Di was a huge fan/admirer of Jackie O. What would have been better than a relationship with her son? The Camelot mystique, etc. I think I could have predicted this one. Could any pairing be more photogenic?
75 posted on 09/12/2006 12:45:02 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Take the high road...the view is always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I wouldn't lump her in with Paris Hilton. Nor would I say she was even close to a saint. She at least gave something back of herself. Paris is in it for Paris.


76 posted on 09/12/2006 12:45:16 PM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Perot?

No wait...FORBES!


77 posted on 09/12/2006 12:45:32 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

>>>I'm with you here. I always thought of her as a spoiled brat. Good looking but not the beauty she's portrayed and sexually profligate. She was not a role model, she was more a poster girl for glam tramps.>>>

I would hardly call Princess Diana a "glam tramp".

She was a real life normal girl, a kindergarten teacher, who would be (were it not for Camilla Horse Face Slut) the Queen of England. It's what dreams are made of for little girls everywhere!!


78 posted on 09/12/2006 12:45:51 PM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
IIRC, Jackie's estate was well under a hundred mil (probably under $50) and I don't think John had any real wealth himself unless it was inherited from his Dad...and, as you said, the whole clan's net worth is said to be in the $850 mil range (and its a big clan), so I wouldn't think he had much of a net worth.
79 posted on 09/12/2006 12:46:39 PM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

She was a silly, inconsequential, twit.


80 posted on 09/12/2006 12:46:41 PM PDT by Scotsman will be Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-244 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson