Posted on 09/08/2006 3:03:17 AM PDT by NZerFromHK
The goals of Freerepublic are "to champion causes which further conservatism in America.". I have noticed there are a couple of posters on this forum who are actively promoting another country/supranational organization's (super-)national interests which are opposite of Ameirca national interests. For instance, there is a well-known Euro poster from Spain who, from what he posts and supports, is an ardent and enthusiastic supporter of the anti-American European Union.
Since such posters clearly disagree with the stated goals of this forum as expressed by the founder as "pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.", I'm wondering if they should be given the boot here, or should they be allowed to stay as long as do not disrupt orders of this board here?
Many thanks in advance.
Well, in my opinion, it's always been a mistake to purge dissenters. Much better to demolish them with argument. But that isn't exactly the prevailing practice here.
If I were the webmaster, anyone with different opinions are welcome, but he must be coming to our site, and willing to commit dialogues with our side "in good faith". Since it is apparent many of the Euroist posters are not coming to dialogue but to evangelize, I have my reservations as to whether to extend red mats to them.
But of course I will leave the whole matter for Mr Robinson to decide, since this is his site and we are guests to his forum.
The important question is not if the europhiles will be booted from FreeRepublic, but if someone can boot them from every position of power in Europe. Democracy and freedom is slowly being lost in Europe - and this only some 15 years after the eastern half of the continent was freed from half a century of subjugation.
When will they ever learn?
I'm a Brit and therefore (by geography only) a European.
I understand what the founder of FreeRepublic set up this site for, but I'm sure, as a champion of freedom of expression, he would be in favour (note favOUr - :) ) of a certain amount of lattitude amongst the views expressed, otherwise we would merely be parroting a party line (an accusation commonly made here against liberals).
For example, I am most certainly pro-God, pro-life and pro-family. I can't really comment on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as I am not a US citizen and don't live under their auspices. Personally I think all attempts to codify "rights" are flawed and doomed to fall short. I am anti-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense and pro-freedom. I can't say I am pro America in the sense that the founder meant. I'm pro-Britain (I hope thats an acceptable alternative!). I oppose liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism and wacko environmentalism. I can't say I totally oppose all forms of those things. That's a pretty wide remit. I'm in favour of abortion for medical reasons for example. I don't understand completely what is meant by "judicial activism". If it is what I suspect, it's pretty irrelevent in my own particular situation. I have no time for the UN, and not much for any other pan-national organisation (apart from the Red Cross, which is a most excellent body).
Does that mean I should be booted for lack of polical purity? Or be "demolished" by argument? You can try that last incidentally. I'm proud of my beliefs, but I hope I'm more proud of being honest, and that includes being prepared to modify said beliefs after debate. That is, after all, what democracy is about, is it not?
But the problem is, we also have people like such who are Euroists and who have zero interests to be supportive of the United States as a nation. This woule be what I consider as an example of a true blue Euroist:
"...I'm sure, as a champion of freedom of expression, he would be in favour (note favOUr - :) ) of a certain amount of lattitude amongst the views expressed..."
I think being unable to spell FAVOR correctly should be grounds for dismissal!! Seriesly! LOL
Are they engaging in debate or merely spewing propaganda ad-nauseum? If the former is the case, let them stay.
Apparently, the answer is no for pople like the second Freeper I linked above - a certain individual who comes from Spain and puts the European Union flag as his "national home" flag.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.