| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 12/01/2006 12:59:54 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason:
new thread started: |
Posted on 09/07/2006 10:11:42 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
New verse:
|
Upon the hearth the fire is red, |
|
|
|
|
Still round the corner there may wait |
|
|
|
Home is behind, the world ahead, |
|
|
I never saw "Buffy". Clare had told me that the guy who's playing the FBI agent on "Bones" used to be on "Angel", which I'd never seen, either..
I have a book by Bernard Lewis, "The Arabs in History". I'm slowly going through it, but it's taking a while.
Now I'm getting an error message with the Google news search.
It's a haint, I'm tellin' ya...
Some say it's almost as good as FireFox :)
I wouldn't know.
In other news I just posted a defense of Rummy on somebody elses' blog. I think I'll share it in a minute.
So, tell me in specific detail why Rumsfeld isn’t mind-numbingly incompetent. Tell me how the administration insistence that the war was going to be a cakewalk has served our national security interests.
Here’s a tip: see if you can defend Bush without mentioning Clinton. I dare ya.
My reply:
Hmm...prove Rummy isn’t incompetent.
Prove a negative.
Oooookay.
1. Over the objections of a bunch of stodgy, stuck-in-the-Cold-War brass (ever the targets of the “real” soldiers’ scorn), he carried out a sweeping modernization of the military, and the Army in particular (in which I have particular interest) in terms of organization, equipment, and technology, and brought in some of the “young turks” who have recently seen combat in the ME and the Horn of Africa to study and revamp battle tactics. A huge amount of this was underway before 9-11, and while it is not yet complete-- these things take time and money, neither of which is ever infinitely available-- it led directly into the next two items.
2. On order, deployed sufficient forces and resupply to carry out guerilla-assisted warfare against the Taliban and reduced it to where it is today… a significant threat, but no longer (a) a national government or (b) secure in any kind of “homeland”. Where the Taliban dares appear, there it quickly dies, usually at the hand of our Afghan allies.
3. On order, deployed a completely different set of forces for a different type of warfare on a different set of terrain. Hampered by Turkey’s refusal to permit a pincers movement from the north, nonetheless effected a 21-day take-down of a significant regional power, breaking records in terms of speed, lightness of casualty, etc. etc. etc. Yes, in historical terms, it was a cakewalk. The street-gang violence occurring now is no more “war” than the Watts Riots were; they differ only in scope, weapons, and purpose.
4. Continued (I almost said continues, but we’ve seen what happened to that) to maintain the US armed forces in a high state of readiness, continuing to meet missions in Germany (!) Italy (!) Japan (!) the Philippines (!) Bosnia-Herzegovina (!) and a myriad others, maintaining troop morale in the face of concentrated efforts to demoralize them, etc. etc. etc.
5. A quick summary.
--modernized the force department-wide, presciently prior to the present emergency
--fought two victorious wars (standard of victory: regime change and alliance with the new governments
--maintained the military in as good a condition as any military involved in combat in more places than are reported has ever been.
The troops hope Mr. Gates will be equal to the task. There is scuttlebutt about a couple of retired Colonels and a serving naval officer being suitable replacements, but the general sense of the people on the ground is “change the man if you must, but keep the policy.”
This guy has been opposed since day one by people whose cheese he moved, whose fiefdoms he disturbed, and whose status quo he de-statussed. He had the temerity to smile while he did it. He had the balls to say “You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you want or would wish to have,” and while the press’n’pundity gasped over his insensitivity, the troops nodded in complete understanding.
The troops loved him, and are sorry to see him go.
I ain’t got no steenking links, by the way. This stuff is known, and all ya gotta know is who to ask. And I ain’t sharin’. Some of these guys want to remain anonymous, and I still haven’t told everything I know.
Until this moment, BJ the Clown has not made an appearance. Dare taken.
Thank you.
Both Mag Industries and Nite Eyze (aftermartket) make LED "bulbs" that replace the regular halogen bulb in the larger MagLites. You get about 1/3 less light (as you do with all LEDs), but gain the benefit of far longer battery life, and near-infiniute bulb life.
The units are packaged like the OEM lightbulb, so they go in just like another bulb. $20 for the Mag brand, and $10 for Nite Eyze. Mag actually makes a couple of models, depending on the number of batteries in your flashlight, while the Nite Eyeze auto-adjusts for voltage, so only one model is needed.
I upgraded my Mag before retiring it. And I can still grab it from the closet if I need it. Of course I'm not a big fan of the dark. That's why I also have a large stash of Cycalume sticks at home, in my truck, and a hidden pocket in my brief case.
Thanks. I just might use that.
Does that gif seem slower to y'all?
clap-clap
clap
(repeat)
Goodnight, all.
300winmag, thanks, that's a great tip. I upgraded my mini-mag light with LED & push button on the end. A cabella's coupon spurred me into action for their light. However, I'll look into the up grade for the c-cell. Didn't know that was available. It's nearly 30 years old. OB
Um...no.
Most excellent!!
Hmmm...does this person know something we don't know?
http://seattle.craigslist.org/oly/wan/232220572.html
Masterfully put, sir.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.