To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...
2 posted on
09/07/2006 7:02:07 PM PDT by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: KevinDavis
stronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope have photographed one of the smallest objects ever seen The brain of a Democrat?
3 posted on
09/07/2006 7:02:21 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
To: KevinDavis
it's also large enough to be a brown dwarf, a failed star
Shown here gravitationally bound to its companion star...
5 posted on
09/07/2006 7:21:09 PM PDT by
mikrofon
(Whatcha say Willis?)
To: KevinDavis
Last I heard, a brown dwarf was 13-80X the mass of Jupiter.
So, fresh from their victory over the now re-defined dwarf planet Pluto, they now want to create
a new class, Dwarf Brown Dwarf?
To: annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum
9 posted on
09/07/2006 10:36:31 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: KevinDavis
I'm sure it is quite important to someone, astronomers or astrologists or semanticists.
Personally, I subscribe to the "if it walks like a duck" school:
It circles a sun,
It has an established orbit around that sun,
It's bigger than a bread basket,
It isn't giving off huge amounts of solar radiation...
Sounds like a planet to me.
10 posted on
09/07/2006 11:23:08 PM PDT by
norton
To: KevinDavis
Wouldn't a brown dwarf be a gas giant? As long as it doesn't have fusion from its mass, wouldn't it still be a planet?
11 posted on
09/08/2006 12:29:06 AM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
To: Calvin Locke; norton; Jedi Master Pikachu; BenLurkin
Additional 'fo in New Scientist:
Alien planet poised to reveal all its secrets
by David Shiga
8 September 2006
Luhman argues that any future definition of the term that includes extrasolar planets should stipulate that the objects form from a disc of gas and dust around their host star and not from a collapsing gas cloud.
This find would be excluded from planetary status if such a definition were adopted, a situation that Luhman says is interesting in itself. "It's a neat idea that you have a planetary-mass companion that may not really be a planet," he says.
13 posted on
09/08/2006 11:05:33 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
14 posted on
09/13/2006 11:17:22 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson