Skip to comments.
Will Vista stall Net traffic?
zdnet ^
| 9/6/2006
| Joris Evers
Posted on 09/06/2006 6:32:55 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Two ways to send data?
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Two ways? That's how I'm reading it:
'Mockapetris believes Vista's introduction will cause a surge in DNS traffic because the operating system supports two versions of the Internet Protocol, a technology standard used to send information over computer networks.'
2
posted on
09/06/2006 6:37:38 PM PDT
by
JockoManning
(Listen Online http://www.klove.com)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Could someone explain this please?
3
posted on
09/06/2006 7:18:15 PM PDT
by
Lawgvr1955
(You can never have too much cowbell !!)
To: Lawgvr1955
4
posted on
09/06/2006 7:24:12 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I don't think this will be an issue. Vista will probably suck in other ways though.
5
posted on
09/06/2006 7:33:06 PM PDT
by
ikka
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I can download things a little faster when using Vista as compared to WinXP...
To: ikka
I don't think this will be an issue. Vista will probably suck in other ways though. yea cause MS is the devil... /sarcasm...
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
This won't be an issue. IPv6 has been in testing for a few years now, and is being phased in slowly. It's a good thing Vista supports it, because in the next few years it will be the standard and IPv4 will be a thing of the past.
If something does go wrong though, it will be on the DNS servers shoulders, because they knew this was coming.
8
posted on
09/07/2006 2:08:48 AM PDT
by
jaredt112
To: ShadowAce
9
posted on
09/07/2006 2:18:37 AM PDT
by
CedarDave
(Steve Irwin: You had to have lived a pretty good life to have this many children mourning your death)
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
10
posted on
09/07/2006 4:52:05 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ikka
"I don't think this will be an issue." I don't think so either. I believe he's saying that some users will go to IPv6 while having IPv4 in place for backward compatibility. This really has nothing much to do with the operating system, except that Vista comes with IPv6 support out of the box. Of course, I could be completely wrong, it's 8AM lol.
11
posted on
09/07/2006 5:03:35 AM PDT
by
KoRn
To: KoRn; ikka
It is entirely possible that the Vista will do both a DNS query using IPv4 and then repeat the query using IPv6 to build it's tables - thats the only way I would think that this would double the DNS traffic.
Thoughts?
12
posted on
09/07/2006 5:25:42 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
To: roaddog727
The thing is that DNS queries are distributed. Every ISP runs a caching DNS server, which looks up the record once, then keeps a copy of the data around until it expires.
So if there are double-requests, the load will be on each ISP's servers, not on some main server that would serve as a bottleneck, or weak link. And the fact is that a DNS lookup is a pretty simple operation.
13
posted on
09/07/2006 5:56:08 AM PDT
by
ikka
To: roaddog727
"DNS query using IPv4 and then repeat the query using IPv6 to build it's tables" That's how I understood it. He wasn't very specific.
14
posted on
09/07/2006 6:03:45 AM PDT
by
KoRn
To: KoRn
"He wasn't very specific."
Probably does not know the difference between his a@@ and 3rd base.
15
posted on
09/07/2006 6:28:21 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
To: Lawgvr1955
Some years back people thought we would run out of internet addresses normal addresses have four fields ranging from 0-255 and many are restricted or owned in large groups.
So they developed a new ip protocol which has a much larger number of addresses called ipv6 there are two major reasons it has not caught on.
Expensive network equipment at the time could not route (move around) ipv6 addresses and alternate solutions have been created (like network address translation). Network address translation is what allows a company of 500 people to only own a few ip addresses yet put every machine on the internet (if they desired to do so).
So now MS has decided to turn both ipv4 and ipv6 on by default so when you type freerepublic.com dns servers will get two request one for the ipv4 address and one for the ipv6 adderss. I would expect MS to turn off ipv6 by default before to long its just not needed yet..
16
posted on
09/07/2006 7:01:49 AM PDT
by
N3WBI3
("I can kill you with my brain" - River Tam)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
He probably means Vista will support both IPv4 and IPv6, the new standard with bigger URL's to give more available addresses.
17
posted on
09/07/2006 7:16:37 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I just installed Vista RC1 and I absolutely HATE IT. It is bloated and everything ha schanged. Tons of super gay picture menus, quick right clicks are not the same... easy ways of getting to options are gone... I switched to "classic" theme and that sucked just as bad... I deleted the install in less than 20 minutes... back to XP (I used acronis to make an image of old system)... anyway, I am totally disgusted with Vista and hate it BIG TIME!!!!
18
posted on
09/07/2006 1:22:04 PM PDT
by
dubie
To: dubie
... I am totally disgusted with Vista and hate it BIG TIME!!!!
Just in case you are truly prophetic (and I don't doubt it)
I've created a new keyword:
KEYWORD: VISTASUCKS
19
posted on
09/07/2006 1:25:14 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: N3WBI3
I would expect MS to turn off ipv6 by default before to long its just not needed yet..Most of the complaints will, in the long run, prove bogus. Not that early users won't have some pain.
20
posted on
09/07/2006 1:28:22 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson