Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police Chief May Lose Job Over Wife's Nude Pics
The Indy Channel ^ | September 6, 2006 | AP

Posted on 09/06/2006 11:21:33 AM PDT by Abathar

SNYDER, Okla. -- An Oklahoma police chief's job is in jeopardy and his town is in an uproar because of his wife's profession.

Snyder Police Chief Tod Ozmun and his wife, Doris, live in Snyder, just west of Lawton. However, the chief's wife is known worldwide for her work as a plus-sized model on a pornographic Web site.

Officials said the Snyder mayor is requesting an investigation by the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation. Technically, the mayor cannot request an OSBI investigation. However, the district attorney's office can, and officials said the focus of any such investigation would be to determine whether city computers were used for the pictures and if that violates the city's charter.

"This came to light because some of the people in town went onto the Internet to download pictures of her and started passing them out around the citizens here in town," said Mayor Dale Moore.

Moore said he's trying to decide what's best for Snyder -- to keep a chief who many believe doesn't share their morals or to fire a man who's keeping residents safe.

"He's done more drug arrests, solved more crimes than anybody else in town has ever done," Moore said.

Resident Bryan Norton said he wants the chief fired.

"When our kids come home from school telling us that the chief's wife is a porno queen, how do you answer that?" said Norton.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: busted; crimeagainstmyeyes; dontscrolldown; donutwatch; dorisozmun; govwatch; libertarians; mrspiggum; porn; todozmun; warningneeded; whatinthehell; yourmomma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last
To: Abathar

BARF. Send her to Club Gitmo. She could get more information out of the prisoners than any torture ever could.


41 posted on 09/06/2006 11:32:06 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The media and the democrats are the biggest supporters of the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Because employers have a right to require dignity and competence from their employees.

And the wives of their employees? And the parents of their employees? And the cousins of their employees?
42 posted on 09/06/2006 11:32:44 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

That's one scary picture, but at least you remembered the "rules."


43 posted on 09/06/2006 11:33:08 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

How does this affect the police chief's work? It would be one thing if she was a felon, or was causing some kind of conflict of interests that called into question the chief's impartiality, but this seemingly has no relevance. The photos might be disturbing, but they're not a reason to oust her husband from his job.


44 posted on 09/06/2006 11:33:37 AM PDT by Polonius (It's called logic, it'll help you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Not only did he exercise poor judgement with these pictures, he also exhibited extremely poor taste.


45 posted on 09/06/2006 11:34:13 AM PDT by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
then the people have to option to vote him out. let them do it that way. the mayor should not fire him if he hasn't done anything wrong

First, he has done something wrong. The details of his personal life reveal that he is lacking in judgment.

Second, the mayor has a right to hire and fire whomever he likes - he is the one responsible to the voters and they can vote him out of office next time if they think he's made a bad decision.

46 posted on 09/06/2006 11:34:22 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Augggghhhh...My eyes!!!!


47 posted on 09/06/2006 11:34:23 AM PDT by GQuagmire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Unless the chief was using city property for the production and distribution of his wife's pics (would seem unlikely), there is really no reason he should be fired. If other people were using city property to access the pics, then that is certainly not the chief's doing.

Sounds like much ado about nothing to me.


48 posted on 09/06/2006 11:34:39 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Fired? He should get a bonus for having to sleep with that!


49 posted on 09/06/2006 11:34:40 AM PDT by meandog (While Clinton isn't fit even to scrape Reagan's shoes, Bush will never fill them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Dude! She's HOT!!! Chief, you're one lucky dude!


50 posted on 09/06/2006 11:34:50 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A certain Queen song comes to mind...


51 posted on 09/06/2006 11:35:13 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

He should be fired for letting her suck up all that internet bandwidth.


52 posted on 09/06/2006 11:35:31 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
And the wives of their employees? And the parents of their employees? And the cousins of their employees?

Absolutely.

In America, you can hire and fire people at will. Unless they are unionized.

53 posted on 09/06/2006 11:35:58 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

No, I saw a FBG yesterday, and she had a pretty face, nice boobs, and still had a waist.


54 posted on 09/06/2006 11:36:03 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Sure, they can do it. I just think it's a pathetic decision made by people who would be better served minding their own business...


55 posted on 09/06/2006 11:37:08 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Polonius
In all seriousness I think it calls into account his morality and how he does his job. Does he represent the morals and values of the people he serves, and can he be trusted to make a judgment call based on those qualities if he has to?
56 posted on 09/06/2006 11:37:19 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
First, he has done something wrong. The details of his personal life reveal that he is lacking in judgment.

What has HE done wrong specifically?
57 posted on 09/06/2006 11:38:06 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
Is that picture the Chief, or his wife?
58 posted on 09/06/2006 11:39:00 AM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
In all seriousness I think it calls into account his morality and how he does his job. Does he represent the morals and values of the people he serves, and can he be trusted to make a judgment call based on those qualities if he has to?

His job is to enforce the law, not to make judgement calls about morality.
59 posted on 09/06/2006 11:39:05 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Gross lack of judgement *nasty*


60 posted on 09/06/2006 11:39:22 AM PDT by GulfBreeze (No one can show me one shred of evidence that atheists even exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson