Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ableLight
There's no evidence Karr was in Boulder until four years after the murder and plenty of evidence he wasn't there in December 1996. His ex-wife, who hates him for what he did to the family with his child porn and fascination with little girls, says he was with her. Plus, there's no explanation so far how he could have known the Ramseys when he lived in Alabama and they lived in Georgia and Colorado.

What we do know is that he's a nut who developed a fascination for the Polly Klass and JonBenet cases, going so far as to move to where the Klass murder happened. He seems to have some weird fantasy thing going about being involved in those crimes, but there's no evidence he was.

As with most high-profile crimes, lots of crazies have "confessed" to this crime, but the DA ain't splainin' why they are taking this one seriously. But then, it's Boulder.

21 posted on 08/28/2006 9:28:53 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker

"As with most high-profile crimes, lots of crazies have "confessed" to this crime,"

I did not stay at a Holiday Inn last night but I agree with you. The DA may be able to trade her sheepskin for a cup of coffee after this is over.


24 posted on 08/28/2006 9:43:26 AM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker

Sure she'll explain...just not on your unreal timetable.


27 posted on 08/28/2006 9:47:52 AM PDT by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker

I'm inclined to agree with you. So far, it looks really thin. I feel like the hold-out juror in the movie "12 angry men". There are posters here who believe that a perp, call him X, is guilty of this crime. All they know about X is that his last name is not Ramsey. I'm saying, whoa!, we don't *know* that for sure. But they seem to be certain of it. They're musing that X might be JMK. The funny thing about it is, they could be right I'm just not ready to make that leap yet. So, yes, I agree with you but I don't think JMK, or any other hypothetical intruder, is excluded either.


28 posted on 08/28/2006 9:51:25 AM PDT by ableLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson