Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker

I'm inclined to agree with you. So far, it looks really thin. I feel like the hold-out juror in the movie "12 angry men". There are posters here who believe that a perp, call him X, is guilty of this crime. All they know about X is that his last name is not Ramsey. I'm saying, whoa!, we don't *know* that for sure. But they seem to be certain of it. They're musing that X might be JMK. The funny thing about it is, they could be right I'm just not ready to make that leap yet. So, yes, I agree with you but I don't think JMK, or any other hypothetical intruder, is excluded either.


28 posted on 08/28/2006 9:51:25 AM PDT by ableLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: ableLight
It's possible there are a series of improbable facts that make Karr the guy, but the DA would have to be sitting on something pretty dramatic no one has yet heard about.

One local commentator is guessing it might be DNA from a snail mail envelope sent by Karr to Tracey. But that's speculation.

If I had to put a DelFrisco's steak dinner and $200 bottle of wine on this, I'd have to say this isn't the guy.

39 posted on 08/28/2006 10:04:34 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: ableLight
I think we are on the same page. I have been on juries where everyone was ready to convict and go home on little more than gut feeling. Sorry folks, I don't work that way. Heaven forbid I ever sit before a jury of my peers, I pray they won't convict me based on gut feeling.

What I find interesting is that the simple fact that we aren't convinced either way makes us the enemy to anyone that thinks the perp was not a Ramsey.

44 posted on 08/28/2006 10:20:50 AM PDT by Kylie_04 (not consuming liquids while posting since 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: ableLight
I just keep adding things up. It would be nice to have insiders information but sometimes better to be independent. Between the ransom note and the yearbook and what Karr has said, I'd say they have the right guy.

Funny, you really need the yearbook to put some teeth in it. It just tell so much about a person who hasn't changed in twenty years. I'd say bro and dad are lying through their teeth.

In Thailand, Karr described the murder as a "blur". He uses "blurred" in his yearbook. It is a reference to "crying" and "bad things happening".

He also said that: telling about the "accident" (crime) would take hours. It was complicated. The note said that the pickup and delivery would be complicated, too.

Well, the pick up and delivery wasn't complicated. There was none.

And it wasn't an accident. It was a brief encounter with a tiny helpless girl. What kind of Victory could that be??

49 posted on 08/28/2006 10:25:11 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson