Its the DNA that counts or does it?
First move will be for Karr's ACLU lawyers, if there is any DNA match is to discredit any match as the samples being degraded
1 posted on
08/20/2006 4:36:20 PM PDT by
apackof2
To: apackof2
Is this melodrama still in the MSM news rotation?
2 posted on
08/20/2006 4:39:37 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: apackof2
The DNA samples from the original crime scene have been digitized. Whether they will be acceptable to a defense attorney is something else. I am not familiar with the process.
5 posted on
08/20/2006 4:43:21 PM PDT by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: apackof2
The major evidence of guilt is his confession. He has volunteered to take the rap. Who says his "ACLU lawyers" will argue anything? The DNA evidence could only mean that someone else was there. It will not necessarily exclude him. We already hear there was no "sex", no semen, etc. The big reason the cops thought it was an inside (family) job was no footprints in the snow. Very weird case. I kinda think he did it, after vascillating due to inaccurate media accounts (which will plague this and any case to no end).
To: apackof2
This clown's a silly little pervert who has always dreamed of being a celebrated pervert.He's no more guilty of this girl's murder than he is of murdering the Lindburgh baby.
9 posted on
08/20/2006 4:49:47 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
("History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid."- Dwight Eisenhower)
To: apackof2
the samples being degradedthe samples were collected 10 years ago and a DNA fingerprint obtained. It is this fingerprint that will be compared to a fingerprint from Karr's DNA.
OTOH, DNA keeps quite well at -72 degrees, and they probably have some of it, but it is the fingerprint that will be compared.
13 posted on
08/20/2006 5:07:09 PM PDT by
Former Fetus
(fetuses are 100% pro-life, they just don't vote yet!)
To: apackof2
When I have almost convinced myself that no sane prosecutor would go after someone like this without some pretty strong evidence, I think of Nifongs Duke rape fiasco where there is apparently little more evidence that a certifiable nut's accusation. Here the certifiable nut is the defendant.
15 posted on
08/20/2006 5:33:40 PM PDT by
JimSEA
( "The purpose of diplomacy is to prolong a crisis." Spock)
To: apackof2
If the DNA matches or is inconclusive, but the palm print also matches it doesn't matter one bit what the defense attorneys argue.
If the DNA is inconclusive and the print doesn't match then they've got lots of wiggle room.
19 posted on
08/20/2006 6:09:57 PM PDT by
Valpal1
(Big Media is like Barney Fife with a gun.)
To: apackof2
He didn't do it. He's obsessed with the precocious little girl and knows a lot about the case. He just wants to be the envy of pedophiles. She was a pedophiles dream come true.
Whether the DNA is "degraded" or not they have the record of it so compare what was found at the scene.
34 posted on
08/24/2006 9:38:31 AM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson