[shalom aleichem]

The major evidence of guilt is his confession. He has volunteered to take the rap. Who says his "ACLU lawyers" will argue anything? The DNA evidence could only mean that someone else was there. It will not necessarily exclude him. We already hear there was no "sex", no semen, etc. The big reason the cops thought it was an inside (family) job was no footprints in the snow. Very weird case. I kinda think he did it, after vascillating due to inaccurate media accounts (which will plague this and any case to no end).

[apackof2]

The big reason the cops thought it was an inside (family) job was no footprints in the snow

There wasn't any snow around the house to leave a footprint

[Draco]

The big reason the cops thought it was an inside (family) job was no footprints in the snow. Very weird case. I kinda think he did it, after vascillating due to inaccurate media accounts (which will plague this and any case to no end).Another apparent "fact" in dispute. Photographs taken the morning of the crime show NO SNOW at all. Lots of bad information circulating.

[cherry]

the DNA evidence ( or lack of) means shinola to the Duke lacrosse players....I don't see them escaping a trial even with NO evidence whatsoever....

and if that is the standard....then, by all means, try Karr and hang him too.....

OTOH.....I have to say that I am compelled to believe he did it, based solely on the Santa Bear photo if it truely does exist......