[JimSEA]

When I have almost convinced myself that no sane prosecutor would go after someone like this without some pretty strong evidence, I think of Nifong’s Duke rape fiasco where there is apparently little more evidence that a certifiable nut's accusation. Here the certifiable nut is the defendant.

[tsmith130]

Coincidence? I think not.

[Guenevere]

Yep, I think we've been Nifonged again!

[xarmydog]

Maybe they are interested in some other unsolved cases he may have been involved in.His track record is a story unto itself.

[sandbar]

>>>When I have almost convinced myself that no sane prosecutor would go after someone like this without some pretty strong evidence, I think of Nifong’s Duke rape fiasco where there is apparently little more evidence that a certifiable nut's accusation. Here the certifiable nut is the defendant.>>>

That's what's confusing me about this. I mean it takes all of a few hours to compare a palm print (I'm sure it's been digitized) and not much longer (few days) for DNA. Why not hold him in his cell and at least rule THAT part out before dragging him across the ocean under arrest for murder. Not to mention the ex-wife said noone even contacted her about him being there. Of course I'm sure they wouldn't want to take a chance on her notifying him they were looking for him. No matter how much her divorce looks like she disliked him. I disliked my ex through my divorce, but things have settled down over the years. However pedophelia is one it'd be hard to get over.

So I can only hope the DA has not completely made her and Boulder Co out to be fools yet again. I would also like to think that the IEA and FBI wouldn't let themselves become involved on a goose chase of a guy who claimed something over some emails to a stranger. I guess we'll see.