Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: StoneWall Brigade; All

If the DNA doesn't match (which I don't think it will) will his pervert a$$ be shipped back to Bangkok? Also, why wasn't his DNA and handwriting confirmed BEFORE he was returned to the U.S.? Oh, that's right! When its taxpayers money, money is no object!


67 posted on 08/20/2006 4:56:17 AM PDT by proudofthesouth (Mao said that power comes at the point of a rifle; I say FREEDOM does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: proudofthesouth
Handwriting is usually inconclusive in a "ransom note" situation. It is an opinion and can easily be twisted into a "reasonable doubt" item.

The early part of the note is written "nervously" and it is off the wall. Then he gets a grip and got to the personal stuff becoming insulting and making sure to mention the southern tie...(a mistake).

If that SBTC was an old "childhood" thing, his brother might be able to help us out.

I believe "Victory" comes before the S.B.T.C. in the note. One without the other makes little sense.

Someplace, there's a cache of his writings. Finding them will be another thing. Did he ever write to his brother? Send cards? We really need something from that time period....handwritten.

He also used this phrase in the yearbook: "Sometimes, so blurred by my own eyes, I've seen the best things come and go simultaneously;"

When he was questioned about the murder, the suspect described the encounter as a "blur".

The only time I have seen or used that word is on FR....when something brings tears to our eyes and the screen is "blurry". It is NOT a common word to describe a "brutal murder". It implies "tears". Was he crying when he killed her? Is the DNA in her private area "His Tears". Was it Victory crying?

The target was John Ramsey and people like him (Rich and powerful). The means of "killing him" and all he represented was "killing his daughter".

69 posted on 08/20/2006 5:42:42 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth
I think they faxed fingerprints and a palm print to the USA and got that confirmation.

DNA has to be done and witnessed by certified labs, double checked and there is the "chain of custody" thing. Be Patient!

Do you think we would accept a DNA anaylsis that was shipped overseas in a courtroom so even if we do have a preliminary test, it's not what we want to use in court. It's an opening for reasonable doubt.

71 posted on 08/20/2006 5:48:18 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson