[freedumb2003]

On the contrary, I have addressed each point and you do not have the intellectual fortitude to repsond with anything other than ad hominem verbiage. That's okay. I'm used to it.

Providing silly, shallow philosophical rejoinders is NOT addressing anything.

And, of course, your so-called "points" were CRUSHED on the next post after mine.

Your adolescent ramblings may be cut to some, sort of a like a 2 year old making bubbles in his chocolate milk. But it gets old (especially when it is repeated like repetition provides credence).

[Fester Chugabrew]

The next post after yours says something about Luther. Please be more specific. Which post scientifically refutes the idea that, where organized matter performs specific functions, this may reasonably be attributed to intelligent design?

[stands2reason]

Of all the nuts and ravers on these threads, there is only one I will scroll by completely.

Okay, I'll scroll by Elsie's "Look at my neat concordance" posts as well, but he's not on autoignore.

CP for Elsie